COVID-19期间的丧亲之痛:一项关于大流行期间非正式和正式支持的使用和感知帮助的全英国在线调查的结果

S. Goss, Renata Mirra, M. Longo, S. Sivell, K. Seddon, A. Torrens-Burton, E. Sutton, A. Nelson, A. Byrne, L. Selman, E. Harrop
{"title":"COVID-19期间的丧亲之痛:一项关于大流行期间非正式和正式支持的使用和感知帮助的全英国在线调查的结果","authors":"S. Goss, Renata Mirra, M. Longo, S. Sivell, K. Seddon, A. Torrens-Burton, E. Sutton, A. Nelson, A. Byrne, L. Selman, E. Harrop","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionMillions became bereaved during the pandemic, with many facing challenges accessing support.AimsTo describe the use and helpfulness of different types of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK.MethodsA longitudinal survey of people bereaved during the pandemic over four time points. At 7- and 13-months post-bereavement (T2 and T3), participants rated the helpfulness of support used and described how they had been helped by this support.Results420 participants completed at least one follow-up survey (T2, T3 or both). Most respondents were female (88.3%) and had lost a parent (57.6%) or partner (24.3%), with 3.3% from a minoritised ethnic background. Support from family and friends, reported by 89.3% of participants, was rated as ‘quite helpful' (mean rating 4.3 out of 5), and included help with practical tasks, expressing feelings/sharing grief, remembering, feeling cared for and less isolated. The most commonly used form of other support was 1:1 support (e.g. counselling), used by 40.5% of participants, with an average helpfulness rating of 4.1, helping participants feel listened to and process their grief. Online community support, used by 31.0% of participants, was also rated ‘quite helpful' (3.9), enabling sharing with similar others, feeling understood and less alone. Informal and formal bereavement groups were rated as similarly helpful (4.2) while helplines and specialist mental health support were slightly less helpful (3.6) (used by 9.3%, 4.8%, 7.1% and 4.5% of participants, respectively).ConclusionsResults demonstrate the perceived benefits and helpfulness of different forms of bereavement support used during the pandemic.ImpactThese findings highlight the value of informal as well as formal support, particularly bereavement counselling. Policy makers must attend to the foundational and second tiers of the public health model of bereavement support, supporting communities as well as services.","PeriodicalId":117798,"journal":{"name":"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"15  Bereavement during COVID-19: findings from a UK-wide online survey on the use and perceived helpfulness of informal and formal support during the pandemic\",\"authors\":\"S. Goss, Renata Mirra, M. Longo, S. Sivell, K. Seddon, A. Torrens-Burton, E. Sutton, A. Nelson, A. Byrne, L. Selman, E. Harrop\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"IntroductionMillions became bereaved during the pandemic, with many facing challenges accessing support.AimsTo describe the use and helpfulness of different types of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK.MethodsA longitudinal survey of people bereaved during the pandemic over four time points. At 7- and 13-months post-bereavement (T2 and T3), participants rated the helpfulness of support used and described how they had been helped by this support.Results420 participants completed at least one follow-up survey (T2, T3 or both). Most respondents were female (88.3%) and had lost a parent (57.6%) or partner (24.3%), with 3.3% from a minoritised ethnic background. Support from family and friends, reported by 89.3% of participants, was rated as ‘quite helpful' (mean rating 4.3 out of 5), and included help with practical tasks, expressing feelings/sharing grief, remembering, feeling cared for and less isolated. The most commonly used form of other support was 1:1 support (e.g. counselling), used by 40.5% of participants, with an average helpfulness rating of 4.1, helping participants feel listened to and process their grief. Online community support, used by 31.0% of participants, was also rated ‘quite helpful' (3.9), enabling sharing with similar others, feeling understood and less alone. Informal and formal bereavement groups were rated as similarly helpful (4.2) while helplines and specialist mental health support were slightly less helpful (3.6) (used by 9.3%, 4.8%, 7.1% and 4.5% of participants, respectively).ConclusionsResults demonstrate the perceived benefits and helpfulness of different forms of bereavement support used during the pandemic.ImpactThese findings highlight the value of informal as well as formal support, particularly bereavement counselling. Policy makers must attend to the foundational and second tiers of the public health model of bereavement support, supporting communities as well as services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":117798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Marie Curie Research Conference 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2023-mcrc.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数百万人在大流行期间失去亲人,许多人在获得支持方面面临挑战。目的描述在英国大流行期间失去亲人的人群中不同类型支持的使用和帮助。方法对大流行期间丧失亲人的人进行纵向调查,调查时间超过四个时间点。在丧亲后的第7个月和第13个月(第2和第3个月),参与者对所使用的支持的帮助程度进行评级,并描述他们是如何得到这种支持的帮助的。420名参与者完成了至少一次随访调查(T2、T3或两者都有)。大多数受访者是女性(88.3%),失去了父母(57.6%)或伴侣(24.3%),其中3.3%来自少数民族背景。89.3%的参与者报告说,来自家人和朋友的支持被评为“非常有帮助”(平均评分为4.3分,满分为5分),包括在实际任务上的帮助,表达情感/分担悲伤,回忆,感觉被关心和不那么孤立。最常用的其他支持形式是1:1的支持(例如咨询),40.5%的参与者使用,平均帮助评分为4.1,帮助参与者感到被倾听并处理他们的悲伤。31.0%的参与者使用网络社区支持,也被评为“非常有帮助”(3.9分),可以与相似的人分享,感觉被理解,不那么孤独。非正式和正式的丧亲小组被评为类似的帮助(4.2),而求助热线和专家心理健康支持的帮助略低(3.6)(分别为9.3%,4.8%,7.1%和4.5%的参与者使用)。结论:研究结果表明,大流行期间使用的不同形式的丧亲支持可以带来明显的好处和帮助。这些发现强调了非正式和正式支持的价值,特别是丧亲辅导。决策者必须关注支持丧亲之痛的公共卫生模式的基础和第二级,支持社区和服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
15  Bereavement during COVID-19: findings from a UK-wide online survey on the use and perceived helpfulness of informal and formal support during the pandemic
IntroductionMillions became bereaved during the pandemic, with many facing challenges accessing support.AimsTo describe the use and helpfulness of different types of support in a cohort of people bereaved during the pandemic in the UK.MethodsA longitudinal survey of people bereaved during the pandemic over four time points. At 7- and 13-months post-bereavement (T2 and T3), participants rated the helpfulness of support used and described how they had been helped by this support.Results420 participants completed at least one follow-up survey (T2, T3 or both). Most respondents were female (88.3%) and had lost a parent (57.6%) or partner (24.3%), with 3.3% from a minoritised ethnic background. Support from family and friends, reported by 89.3% of participants, was rated as ‘quite helpful' (mean rating 4.3 out of 5), and included help with practical tasks, expressing feelings/sharing grief, remembering, feeling cared for and less isolated. The most commonly used form of other support was 1:1 support (e.g. counselling), used by 40.5% of participants, with an average helpfulness rating of 4.1, helping participants feel listened to and process their grief. Online community support, used by 31.0% of participants, was also rated ‘quite helpful' (3.9), enabling sharing with similar others, feeling understood and less alone. Informal and formal bereavement groups were rated as similarly helpful (4.2) while helplines and specialist mental health support were slightly less helpful (3.6) (used by 9.3%, 4.8%, 7.1% and 4.5% of participants, respectively).ConclusionsResults demonstrate the perceived benefits and helpfulness of different forms of bereavement support used during the pandemic.ImpactThese findings highlight the value of informal as well as formal support, particularly bereavement counselling. Policy makers must attend to the foundational and second tiers of the public health model of bereavement support, supporting communities as well as services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信