外国判决承认与执行中的互惠原则:困境与解决

Chunlong Xu
{"title":"外国判决承认与执行中的互惠原则:困境与解决","authors":"Chunlong Xu","doi":"10.23977/law.2023.020303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In China’s judicial practice, de facto reciprocity is the underlying principle for recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments and rulings by foreign countries with which China has not concluded bilateral or international treaties. The principle of reciprocity, now widely considered the key basis for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, should be reviewed since misuse of this principle may incur revanchism or impede the smooth enforcement of judgments. Based on the implementation of reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China, the varied interpretations of judicial practice are critically analyzed, and suggestions for legislative and judicial practice are proposed from six perspectives including jurisdiction, due process, and legitimacy of judgments. The present work is intended to improve China’s system of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and enhance China’s image in international judicial practice.","PeriodicalId":271650,"journal":{"name":"Science of Law Journal","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Reciprocity Principle in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements: Dilemma and Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Chunlong Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.23977/law.2023.020303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In China’s judicial practice, de facto reciprocity is the underlying principle for recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments and rulings by foreign countries with which China has not concluded bilateral or international treaties. The principle of reciprocity, now widely considered the key basis for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, should be reviewed since misuse of this principle may incur revanchism or impede the smooth enforcement of judgments. Based on the implementation of reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China, the varied interpretations of judicial practice are critically analyzed, and suggestions for legislative and judicial practice are proposed from six perspectives including jurisdiction, due process, and legitimacy of judgments. The present work is intended to improve China’s system of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and enhance China’s image in international judicial practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":271650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science of Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23977/law.2023.020303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国司法实践中,事实互惠是承认和执行未与中国缔结双边条约或国际条约的外国民商事判决、裁定的基本原则。互惠原则现在被广泛认为是承认和执行外国判决的关键基础,应加以审查,因为滥用这一原则可能招致报复或妨碍判决的顺利执行。本文以外国判决相互承认与执行在中国的实施为背景,批判性地分析了司法实践中的各种解释,并从管辖权、正当程序和判决合法性六个方面提出了立法和司法实践建议。本工作旨在完善中国承认和执行外国判决的制度,提高中国在国际司法实践中的形象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Reciprocity Principle in Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgements: Dilemma and Solutions
: In China’s judicial practice, de facto reciprocity is the underlying principle for recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments and rulings by foreign countries with which China has not concluded bilateral or international treaties. The principle of reciprocity, now widely considered the key basis for recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments, should be reviewed since misuse of this principle may incur revanchism or impede the smooth enforcement of judgments. Based on the implementation of reciprocal recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in China, the varied interpretations of judicial practice are critically analyzed, and suggestions for legislative and judicial practice are proposed from six perspectives including jurisdiction, due process, and legitimacy of judgments. The present work is intended to improve China’s system of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments and enhance China’s image in international judicial practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信