巴布亚互联网接入限制的执法审查

R. H. Rado
{"title":"巴布亚互联网接入限制的执法审查","authors":"R. H. Rado","doi":"10.30652/ml.v7i1.7903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Actions to limit internet access in Papua by the Government to quell mass demonstrators in Papua have become a polemic to this day. This research focuses not only on how the process of taking these actions and the side effects, namely human rights issues, but also has implications for aspects of law enforcement that are in the spotlight. This research uses normative juridical research with primary legal material in the form of laws and regulations combined with analytical descriptive studies. The results of the study found that there is no basis for government legitimacy to limit internet access, which may be limited to restrictions on access to electronic information (social media) containing violations of the law, so apart from being said that the action violates human rights (HAM), law enforcement that can be applied to the government both in the fields of administrative law, civil law, and criminal law as long as the elements are fulfilled.","PeriodicalId":304890,"journal":{"name":"Melayunesia Law","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law Enforcement Review of Internet Access Restrictions in Papua\",\"authors\":\"R. H. Rado\",\"doi\":\"10.30652/ml.v7i1.7903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Actions to limit internet access in Papua by the Government to quell mass demonstrators in Papua have become a polemic to this day. This research focuses not only on how the process of taking these actions and the side effects, namely human rights issues, but also has implications for aspects of law enforcement that are in the spotlight. This research uses normative juridical research with primary legal material in the form of laws and regulations combined with analytical descriptive studies. The results of the study found that there is no basis for government legitimacy to limit internet access, which may be limited to restrictions on access to electronic information (social media) containing violations of the law, so apart from being said that the action violates human rights (HAM), law enforcement that can be applied to the government both in the fields of administrative law, civil law, and criminal law as long as the elements are fulfilled.\",\"PeriodicalId\":304890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melayunesia Law\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melayunesia Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v7i1.7903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melayunesia Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30652/ml.v7i1.7903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

政府为镇压巴布亚的大规模示威者而采取的限制巴布亚互联网接入的行动,至今仍是一场论战。这项研究不仅侧重于如何采取这些行动的过程及其副作用,即人权问题,而且还对受到关注的执法方面产生影响。本研究采用规范性法律研究,以法律法规的形式,结合分析性描述性研究的原始法律材料。研究结果发现,政府限制互联网接入的合法性没有依据,可能仅限于限制访问包含违法行为的电子信息(社交媒体),因此,除了说该行为侵犯人权(HAM)外,只要满足要素,就可以在行政法,民法和刑法领域适用于政府的执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law Enforcement Review of Internet Access Restrictions in Papua
Actions to limit internet access in Papua by the Government to quell mass demonstrators in Papua have become a polemic to this day. This research focuses not only on how the process of taking these actions and the side effects, namely human rights issues, but also has implications for aspects of law enforcement that are in the spotlight. This research uses normative juridical research with primary legal material in the form of laws and regulations combined with analytical descriptive studies. The results of the study found that there is no basis for government legitimacy to limit internet access, which may be limited to restrictions on access to electronic information (social media) containing violations of the law, so apart from being said that the action violates human rights (HAM), law enforcement that can be applied to the government both in the fields of administrative law, civil law, and criminal law as long as the elements are fulfilled.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信