空心螺旋桩在球团/RS中动态加载试验的承载能力评价

Murilo Tarozzo, Thaís Maria Leite Paludeto, D. Carvalho, Paulo J. R. Albuquerque
{"title":"空心螺旋桩在球团/RS中动态加载试验的承载能力评价","authors":"Murilo Tarozzo, Thaís Maria Leite Paludeto, D. Carvalho, Paulo J. R. Albuquerque","doi":"10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0275","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In this paper, it was studied the behavior of 310 mm diameter Hollow Auger Piles, with a drilled length of 28 m, 22 m and 15 m, in Pelotas, RS, Brazil, through the analyses of the results of five Dynamic Load Testings. This paper’s goal, therefore, is to analyze the CAPWAP results and compare to semi-empirical methods: Lizzi (1982), Décourt & Quaresma (1996), Aoki & Velloso (1975) and Teixeira (1996). With that in mind, the calculations were made using the pre-determined coefficients from each method for Root Piles, Continuous Flight Auger Piles and Bored Piles, which had executive similarities with the studied pile. Adopting the ultimate loads obtained in the dynamic load tests as reference, it was found that these values were close to some of the values provided by the formulas. However, it was considered that these methods were developed based on static load tests, which do not always present the same values as the dynamic load tests. On average, it was observed that the calculations as Root Piles and Continuous Flight Auger Piles presented results, respectively, 80% and 20% higher. As for Bored Piles, the results were close to what was expected. Load Semi-empirical methods, Load Capacity.","PeriodicalId":206776,"journal":{"name":"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Avaliação de Capacidade de Carga de Estacas Hollow Auger por meio de Ensaios de Carregamento Dinâmico, em Pelotas/RS\",\"authors\":\"Murilo Tarozzo, Thaís Maria Leite Paludeto, D. Carvalho, Paulo J. R. Albuquerque\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0275\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In this paper, it was studied the behavior of 310 mm diameter Hollow Auger Piles, with a drilled length of 28 m, 22 m and 15 m, in Pelotas, RS, Brazil, through the analyses of the results of five Dynamic Load Testings. This paper’s goal, therefore, is to analyze the CAPWAP results and compare to semi-empirical methods: Lizzi (1982), Décourt & Quaresma (1996), Aoki & Velloso (1975) and Teixeira (1996). With that in mind, the calculations were made using the pre-determined coefficients from each method for Root Piles, Continuous Flight Auger Piles and Bored Piles, which had executive similarities with the studied pile. Adopting the ultimate loads obtained in the dynamic load tests as reference, it was found that these values were close to some of the values provided by the formulas. However, it was considered that these methods were developed based on static load tests, which do not always present the same values as the dynamic load tests. On average, it was observed that the calculations as Root Piles and Continuous Flight Auger Piles presented results, respectively, 80% and 20% higher. As for Bored Piles, the results were close to what was expected. Load Semi-empirical methods, Load Capacity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0275\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congresso Brasileiro de Mecânica dos Solos e Engenharia Geotécnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/cobramseg.2022.0275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在巴西RS Pelotas,通过对5次动载试验结果的分析,研究了直径310 mm、钻孔长度28 m、22 m和15 m的空心螺旋桩的性能。因此,本文的目标是分析CAPWAP结果,并与半经验方法进行比较:Lizzi(1982)、d court & Quaresma(1996)、Aoki & Velloso(1975)和Teixeira(1996)。考虑到这一点,对与所研究的桩具有执行相似性的根桩、连续螺旋钻桩和钻孔桩,使用每种方法的预先确定系数进行计算。以动载试验得到的极限荷载为参考,发现这些值与公式提供的一些值接近。然而,有人认为,这些方法是基于静态负载测试开发的,其结果并不总是与动态负载测试相同。平均来看,根桩和连续螺旋钻桩的计算结果分别高出80%和20%。至于钻孔桩,结果接近预期。荷载半经验方法,荷载能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Avaliação de Capacidade de Carga de Estacas Hollow Auger por meio de Ensaios de Carregamento Dinâmico, em Pelotas/RS
: In this paper, it was studied the behavior of 310 mm diameter Hollow Auger Piles, with a drilled length of 28 m, 22 m and 15 m, in Pelotas, RS, Brazil, through the analyses of the results of five Dynamic Load Testings. This paper’s goal, therefore, is to analyze the CAPWAP results and compare to semi-empirical methods: Lizzi (1982), Décourt & Quaresma (1996), Aoki & Velloso (1975) and Teixeira (1996). With that in mind, the calculations were made using the pre-determined coefficients from each method for Root Piles, Continuous Flight Auger Piles and Bored Piles, which had executive similarities with the studied pile. Adopting the ultimate loads obtained in the dynamic load tests as reference, it was found that these values were close to some of the values provided by the formulas. However, it was considered that these methods were developed based on static load tests, which do not always present the same values as the dynamic load tests. On average, it was observed that the calculations as Root Piles and Continuous Flight Auger Piles presented results, respectively, 80% and 20% higher. As for Bored Piles, the results were close to what was expected. Load Semi-empirical methods, Load Capacity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信