{"title":"来不及规定:将第68条规则与简易判决相协调","authors":"C. Turner","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2398083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Comment illustrates that the conflict between FRCP 68 and summary judgment can be resolved by reconsidering the assumption that Rule 68 operates like a contract. By interpreting Rule 68 as a stipulation and venerating the difference between summary and final judgments, courts can increase certainty in Rule 68’s operation and, hopefully, promote greater use of the Rule as its drafters intended.","PeriodicalId":113747,"journal":{"name":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Too Late to Stipulate: Reconciling Rule 68 with Summary Judgments\",\"authors\":\"C. Turner\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2398083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Comment illustrates that the conflict between FRCP 68 and summary judgment can be resolved by reconsidering the assumption that Rule 68 operates like a contract. By interpreting Rule 68 as a stipulation and venerating the difference between summary and final judgments, courts can increase certainty in Rule 68’s operation and, hopefully, promote greater use of the Rule as its drafters intended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Litigation & Procedure eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2398083\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Litigation & Procedure eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2398083","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Too Late to Stipulate: Reconciling Rule 68 with Summary Judgments
This Comment illustrates that the conflict between FRCP 68 and summary judgment can be resolved by reconsidering the assumption that Rule 68 operates like a contract. By interpreting Rule 68 as a stipulation and venerating the difference between summary and final judgments, courts can increase certainty in Rule 68’s operation and, hopefully, promote greater use of the Rule as its drafters intended.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
