人工智能、民主和法律

C. Djeffal
{"title":"人工智能、民主和法律","authors":"C. Djeffal","doi":"10.14361/9783839447192-016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital technologies are in the process of reconfiguring our democracy. While we look for orientation and guidance in this process, the relationship between technology and democracy is unclear and seems to be in f lux. Are technology and democracy mirroring each other?1 The internet was first hailed as genuinely democratic technology and ultimate enabler of democracy. It is now often perceived as a major threat to democracy. The story of artificial intelligence (AI) might turn out to be quite the opposite. While there are many ref lections on AI as a threat to or even as the end of democracy,2 some voices highlight the democratic potentials of AI.3 As is often the case, the research results depend on the premises underlying the research. This chapter is based on the assertion that technologies and media shape human affairs to a large extent, but that technology in turn is also shaped by human choices and decisions. There is a huge potential to endanger, game or even abolish democratic processes. On the contrary, there might also be opportunities to further democracy. Therefore, the extent to which AI impacts democracy is subject to the paths that are chosen in research, development and application of AI in society. The main purpose of this chapter is to highlight the room for choice in the construction of AI and its impacts on the future of democracy. It will also inquire into how law and jurisprudence relate to these questions. From this perspective, current impacts of AI on democracy have an important indicative function. But in the face of further possibilities of inventions and regulative measures on different levels, they are only precursors to what will and should be possible. In that sense, this chapter is also an attempt to deal with developments and inventions we cannot yet grasp. The main argument is that it might be possible to inf luence them nevertheless. Therefore, the chapter will ref lect on the possibility and necessity to democratize AI from a legal and jurisprudential perspective. It will then look at different ways to democratize AI.","PeriodicalId":151185,"journal":{"name":"The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"26 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI, Democracy and the Law\",\"authors\":\"C. Djeffal\",\"doi\":\"10.14361/9783839447192-016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Digital technologies are in the process of reconfiguring our democracy. While we look for orientation and guidance in this process, the relationship between technology and democracy is unclear and seems to be in f lux. Are technology and democracy mirroring each other?1 The internet was first hailed as genuinely democratic technology and ultimate enabler of democracy. It is now often perceived as a major threat to democracy. The story of artificial intelligence (AI) might turn out to be quite the opposite. While there are many ref lections on AI as a threat to or even as the end of democracy,2 some voices highlight the democratic potentials of AI.3 As is often the case, the research results depend on the premises underlying the research. This chapter is based on the assertion that technologies and media shape human affairs to a large extent, but that technology in turn is also shaped by human choices and decisions. There is a huge potential to endanger, game or even abolish democratic processes. On the contrary, there might also be opportunities to further democracy. Therefore, the extent to which AI impacts democracy is subject to the paths that are chosen in research, development and application of AI in society. The main purpose of this chapter is to highlight the room for choice in the construction of AI and its impacts on the future of democracy. It will also inquire into how law and jurisprudence relate to these questions. From this perspective, current impacts of AI on democracy have an important indicative function. But in the face of further possibilities of inventions and regulative measures on different levels, they are only precursors to what will and should be possible. In that sense, this chapter is also an attempt to deal with developments and inventions we cannot yet grasp. The main argument is that it might be possible to inf luence them nevertheless. Therefore, the chapter will ref lect on the possibility and necessity to democratize AI from a legal and jurisprudential perspective. It will then look at different ways to democratize AI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"26 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839447192-016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Democratization of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839447192-016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

数字技术正在重塑我们的民主。当我们在这一过程中寻找方向和指导时,技术与民主之间的关系并不明确,而且似乎在不断变化。科技和民主是互为镜像吗?互联网最初被誉为真正的民主技术和民主的最终推动者。现在,它经常被视为民主的主要威胁。人工智能(AI)的故事可能会完全相反。虽然有很多人认为人工智能是对民主的威胁,甚至是民主的终结,但也有一些声音强调了人工智能的民主潜力。3通常情况下,研究结果取决于研究的前提。这一章的基础是,技术和媒体在很大程度上塑造了人类事务,但技术反过来也受到人类选择和决策的影响。威胁、玩弄甚至废除民主进程的可能性很大。相反,也可能有进一步民主的机会。因此,人工智能对民主的影响程度取决于人工智能在社会中研究、开发和应用的路径选择。本章的主要目的是强调人工智能建设的选择空间及其对未来民主的影响。它还将探讨法律和法理学如何与这些问题有关。从这个角度来看,当前人工智能对民主的影响具有重要的指示作用。但是,面对更多的发明可能性和不同层面的监管措施,它们只是将会和应该成为可能的东西的前奏。从这个意义上说,这一章也试图处理我们还无法掌握的发展和发明。主要的论点是,尽管如此,还是有可能影响他们。因此,本章将从法律和法理学的角度思考人工智能民主化的可能性和必要性。然后,它将研究使人工智能民主化的不同方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
AI, Democracy and the Law
Digital technologies are in the process of reconfiguring our democracy. While we look for orientation and guidance in this process, the relationship between technology and democracy is unclear and seems to be in f lux. Are technology and democracy mirroring each other?1 The internet was first hailed as genuinely democratic technology and ultimate enabler of democracy. It is now often perceived as a major threat to democracy. The story of artificial intelligence (AI) might turn out to be quite the opposite. While there are many ref lections on AI as a threat to or even as the end of democracy,2 some voices highlight the democratic potentials of AI.3 As is often the case, the research results depend on the premises underlying the research. This chapter is based on the assertion that technologies and media shape human affairs to a large extent, but that technology in turn is also shaped by human choices and decisions. There is a huge potential to endanger, game or even abolish democratic processes. On the contrary, there might also be opportunities to further democracy. Therefore, the extent to which AI impacts democracy is subject to the paths that are chosen in research, development and application of AI in society. The main purpose of this chapter is to highlight the room for choice in the construction of AI and its impacts on the future of democracy. It will also inquire into how law and jurisprudence relate to these questions. From this perspective, current impacts of AI on democracy have an important indicative function. But in the face of further possibilities of inventions and regulative measures on different levels, they are only precursors to what will and should be possible. In that sense, this chapter is also an attempt to deal with developments and inventions we cannot yet grasp. The main argument is that it might be possible to inf luence them nevertheless. Therefore, the chapter will ref lect on the possibility and necessity to democratize AI from a legal and jurisprudential perspective. It will then look at different ways to democratize AI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信