{"title":"新型冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)的实验室标志物和死亡率:系统综述和荟萃分析","authors":"Davis Joshua, Geffe Shane, Hana Gina, T. Connor","doi":"10.36959/592/391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high mortality. Many laboratory values have been suggested to predict patients at risk for a poor outcome in COVID-19.The objective of this project was to systematically review and meta-analyze all laboratory markers associated with prognosis of mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, SCOPUS, MedRxIv, preprints.org, and Centers for Disease Control databases from November 2019 to April 10, 2020 for articles on laboratory values and mortality in COVID-19 and updated the search July 20, 2020. Teams of 2 independent reviewers reviewed titles and abstracts for studies that reported mortality and laboratory values and subsequently abstracted relevant data. Results: Our initial search identified 6,973 articles and a total of 96 articles (30 articles from first search and 66 from updated search) on 72 laboratory values were included. Many laboratory values were associated with mortality, but those most associated with mortality included lymphopenia (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.24-0.36), thrombocytopenia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (OR 7.32, 95% CI 5.19-10.33), and ferritinemia (OR 5.19, 95% CI 3.07-8.62). All cardiac markers were associated with mortality, with troponin being the least associated. A low PaO2:FiO2 ratio was also associated with mortality (OR 0.13, 95% CI -0.06-0.28). Heterogeneity was high and risk of bias was moderate. Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified many laboratory abnormalities associated with mortality in COVID-19, though was limited by heterogeneity. Laboratory markers previously identified as associated with a poor prognosis in COVID-19 were confirmed to be those most associated with mortality in this large meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":422263,"journal":{"name":"Scholarly Journal of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laboratory Markers and Mortality in Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Davis Joshua, Geffe Shane, Hana Gina, T. Connor\",\"doi\":\"10.36959/592/391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high mortality. Many laboratory values have been suggested to predict patients at risk for a poor outcome in COVID-19.The objective of this project was to systematically review and meta-analyze all laboratory markers associated with prognosis of mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, SCOPUS, MedRxIv, preprints.org, and Centers for Disease Control databases from November 2019 to April 10, 2020 for articles on laboratory values and mortality in COVID-19 and updated the search July 20, 2020. Teams of 2 independent reviewers reviewed titles and abstracts for studies that reported mortality and laboratory values and subsequently abstracted relevant data. Results: Our initial search identified 6,973 articles and a total of 96 articles (30 articles from first search and 66 from updated search) on 72 laboratory values were included. Many laboratory values were associated with mortality, but those most associated with mortality included lymphopenia (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.24-0.36), thrombocytopenia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (OR 7.32, 95% CI 5.19-10.33), and ferritinemia (OR 5.19, 95% CI 3.07-8.62). All cardiac markers were associated with mortality, with troponin being the least associated. A low PaO2:FiO2 ratio was also associated with mortality (OR 0.13, 95% CI -0.06-0.28). Heterogeneity was high and risk of bias was moderate. Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified many laboratory abnormalities associated with mortality in COVID-19, though was limited by heterogeneity. Laboratory markers previously identified as associated with a poor prognosis in COVID-19 were confirmed to be those most associated with mortality in this large meta-analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scholarly Journal of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scholarly Journal of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36959/592/391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scholarly Journal of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/592/391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:新型冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)与高死亡率相关。已经提出了许多实验室值来预测COVID-19患者预后不良的风险。该项目的目的是系统回顾和荟萃分析与COVID-19患者死亡预后相关的所有实验室标志物。方法:检索OVID Medline、SCOPUS、MedRxIv、preprints.org和疾病控制中心数据库,检索2019年11月至2020年4月10日有关COVID-19实验室值和死亡率的文章,并于2020年7月20日更新检索结果。由2名独立审稿人组成的小组审查了报告死亡率和实验室值的研究的标题和摘要,并随后摘录了相关数据。结果:我们的初始检索确定了6,973篇文章,共纳入了96篇文章(30篇来自首次检索,66篇来自更新检索),涉及72个实验室值。许多实验室值与死亡率相关,但与死亡率最相关的包括淋巴细胞减少(OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.24-0.36)、血小板减少(OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60)、乳酸脱氢酶升高(OR 7.32, 95% CI 5.19-10.33)和铁蛋白血症(OR 5.19, 95% CI 3.07-8.62)。所有心脏指标均与死亡率相关,其中肌钙蛋白相关性最小。低PaO2:FiO2比值也与死亡率相关(OR 0.13, 95% CI -0.06-0.28)。异质性高,偏倚风险中等。结论:该荟萃分析确定了许多与COVID-19死亡率相关的实验室异常,尽管受到异质性的限制。在这项大型荟萃分析中,先前确定与COVID-19预后不良相关的实验室标志物被证实是与死亡率最相关的实验室标志物。
Laboratory Markers and Mortality in Novel Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with high mortality. Many laboratory values have been suggested to predict patients at risk for a poor outcome in COVID-19.The objective of this project was to systematically review and meta-analyze all laboratory markers associated with prognosis of mortality in patients with COVID-19. Methods: We searched OVID Medline, SCOPUS, MedRxIv, preprints.org, and Centers for Disease Control databases from November 2019 to April 10, 2020 for articles on laboratory values and mortality in COVID-19 and updated the search July 20, 2020. Teams of 2 independent reviewers reviewed titles and abstracts for studies that reported mortality and laboratory values and subsequently abstracted relevant data. Results: Our initial search identified 6,973 articles and a total of 96 articles (30 articles from first search and 66 from updated search) on 72 laboratory values were included. Many laboratory values were associated with mortality, but those most associated with mortality included lymphopenia (OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.24-0.36), thrombocytopenia (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.35-0.60), elevated lactate dehydrogenase (OR 7.32, 95% CI 5.19-10.33), and ferritinemia (OR 5.19, 95% CI 3.07-8.62). All cardiac markers were associated with mortality, with troponin being the least associated. A low PaO2:FiO2 ratio was also associated with mortality (OR 0.13, 95% CI -0.06-0.28). Heterogeneity was high and risk of bias was moderate. Conclusions: This meta-analysis identified many laboratory abnormalities associated with mortality in COVID-19, though was limited by heterogeneity. Laboratory markers previously identified as associated with a poor prognosis in COVID-19 were confirmed to be those most associated with mortality in this large meta-analysis.