J M LeFebvre, E Spanner, A P Heidenheim, R M Lindsay
{"title":"Kt/V:病人不吃医生开的药。","authors":"J M LeFebvre, E Spanner, A P Heidenheim, R M Lindsay","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Monthly urea kinetic modeling is performed [service Kt/V (urea)] to ensure that dialysis prescriptions provide patients a Kt/V greater than or equal to 1 and yield a protein catabolic rate (PCR) greater than or equal to 0.8. The frequency with which the dialysis prescription (physician's order +/- 5%, p +/- 5%) was achieved was calculated by three methods: 1) CompuMod (3 ureas; computer derived), 2) Jindal-Goldstein, and 3) Daugirdas, (2 and 3% reduction of urea). Ten patients were followed serially over 1 month for a total of 120 dialyses. Mean Kt/V values for each method were: prescription, 1.54 +/- 0.36; service, 1.40 +/- t0.63; CompuMod, 1.33 +/- 0.27; Jindal-Goldstein, 1.55 +/- 0.24; and Daugirdas, 1.33 +/- 0.23. The percentages of dialyses within the p +/- 5% were 12.4%, CompuMod; 12.8%, Jindal-Goldstein and 14.3%, Daugirdas. The percentages above p +/- 5% were 20.4%, CompuMod; 47%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 21.4%, Daugirdas. The percentages below p +/- 5% were 67.3%, CompuMod; 40.2%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 64.3%, Daugirdas. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods of assessment of Kt/V were significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than the prescribed Kt/V, whereas the Jindal-Goldstein estimate was not. The authors conclude that dialysis patients rarely achieve their prescribed Kt/V. The service Kt/V, therefore, is not a useful parameter for prescribing dialysis therapy. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods are the best estimates of the Kt/V, while the Jindal-Goldstein equation overestimates the Kt/V. The need for frequent urea kinetic modelling is stressed. An online urea monitor for each dialysis would be the ideal solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":77493,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO transactions","volume":"37 3","pages":"M132-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kt/V: patients do not get what the physician prescribes.\",\"authors\":\"J M LeFebvre, E Spanner, A P Heidenheim, R M Lindsay\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Monthly urea kinetic modeling is performed [service Kt/V (urea)] to ensure that dialysis prescriptions provide patients a Kt/V greater than or equal to 1 and yield a protein catabolic rate (PCR) greater than or equal to 0.8. The frequency with which the dialysis prescription (physician's order +/- 5%, p +/- 5%) was achieved was calculated by three methods: 1) CompuMod (3 ureas; computer derived), 2) Jindal-Goldstein, and 3) Daugirdas, (2 and 3% reduction of urea). Ten patients were followed serially over 1 month for a total of 120 dialyses. Mean Kt/V values for each method were: prescription, 1.54 +/- 0.36; service, 1.40 +/- t0.63; CompuMod, 1.33 +/- 0.27; Jindal-Goldstein, 1.55 +/- 0.24; and Daugirdas, 1.33 +/- 0.23. The percentages of dialyses within the p +/- 5% were 12.4%, CompuMod; 12.8%, Jindal-Goldstein and 14.3%, Daugirdas. The percentages above p +/- 5% were 20.4%, CompuMod; 47%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 21.4%, Daugirdas. The percentages below p +/- 5% were 67.3%, CompuMod; 40.2%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 64.3%, Daugirdas. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods of assessment of Kt/V were significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than the prescribed Kt/V, whereas the Jindal-Goldstein estimate was not. The authors conclude that dialysis patients rarely achieve their prescribed Kt/V. The service Kt/V, therefore, is not a useful parameter for prescribing dialysis therapy. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods are the best estimates of the Kt/V, while the Jindal-Goldstein equation overestimates the Kt/V. The need for frequent urea kinetic modelling is stressed. An online urea monitor for each dialysis would be the ideal solution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO transactions\",\"volume\":\"37 3\",\"pages\":\"M132-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO transactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO transactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kt/V: patients do not get what the physician prescribes.
Monthly urea kinetic modeling is performed [service Kt/V (urea)] to ensure that dialysis prescriptions provide patients a Kt/V greater than or equal to 1 and yield a protein catabolic rate (PCR) greater than or equal to 0.8. The frequency with which the dialysis prescription (physician's order +/- 5%, p +/- 5%) was achieved was calculated by three methods: 1) CompuMod (3 ureas; computer derived), 2) Jindal-Goldstein, and 3) Daugirdas, (2 and 3% reduction of urea). Ten patients were followed serially over 1 month for a total of 120 dialyses. Mean Kt/V values for each method were: prescription, 1.54 +/- 0.36; service, 1.40 +/- t0.63; CompuMod, 1.33 +/- 0.27; Jindal-Goldstein, 1.55 +/- 0.24; and Daugirdas, 1.33 +/- 0.23. The percentages of dialyses within the p +/- 5% were 12.4%, CompuMod; 12.8%, Jindal-Goldstein and 14.3%, Daugirdas. The percentages above p +/- 5% were 20.4%, CompuMod; 47%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 21.4%, Daugirdas. The percentages below p +/- 5% were 67.3%, CompuMod; 40.2%, Jindal-Goldstein; and 64.3%, Daugirdas. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods of assessment of Kt/V were significantly lower (p less than 0.001) than the prescribed Kt/V, whereas the Jindal-Goldstein estimate was not. The authors conclude that dialysis patients rarely achieve their prescribed Kt/V. The service Kt/V, therefore, is not a useful parameter for prescribing dialysis therapy. The CompuMod and Daugirdas methods are the best estimates of the Kt/V, while the Jindal-Goldstein equation overestimates the Kt/V. The need for frequent urea kinetic modelling is stressed. An online urea monitor for each dialysis would be the ideal solution.