基于PDS的kNN分类器对京都数据集的影响

K. Swathi, B. Rao
{"title":"基于PDS的kNN分类器对京都数据集的影响","authors":"K. Swathi, B. Rao","doi":"10.4018/IJRSDA.2019040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the performance of different Partial Distance Search-based (PDS) kNN classifiers on a benchmark Kyoto 2006+ dataset for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). These PDS classifiers are named based on features indexing. They are: i) Simple PDS kNN, the features are not indexed (SPDS), ii) Variance indexing based kNN (VIPDS), the features are indexed by the variance of the features, and iii) Correlation coefficient indexing-based kNN (CIPDS), the features are indexed by the correlation coefficient of the features with a class label. For comparative study between these classifiers, the computational time and accuracy are considered performance measures. After the experimental study, it is observed that the CIPDS gives better performance in terms of computational time whereas VIPDS shows better accuracy, but not much significant difference when compared with CIPDS. The study suggests to adopt CIPDS when class labels were available without any ambiguity, otherwise it suggested the adoption of VIPDS.","PeriodicalId":152357,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of PDS Based kNN Classifiers on Kyoto Dataset\",\"authors\":\"K. Swathi, B. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJRSDA.2019040105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article compares the performance of different Partial Distance Search-based (PDS) kNN classifiers on a benchmark Kyoto 2006+ dataset for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). These PDS classifiers are named based on features indexing. They are: i) Simple PDS kNN, the features are not indexed (SPDS), ii) Variance indexing based kNN (VIPDS), the features are indexed by the variance of the features, and iii) Correlation coefficient indexing-based kNN (CIPDS), the features are indexed by the correlation coefficient of the features with a class label. For comparative study between these classifiers, the computational time and accuracy are considered performance measures. After the experimental study, it is observed that the CIPDS gives better performance in terms of computational time whereas VIPDS shows better accuracy, but not much significant difference when compared with CIPDS. The study suggests to adopt CIPDS when class labels were available without any ambiguity, otherwise it suggested the adoption of VIPDS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":152357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal.\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRSDA.2019040105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Rough Sets Data Anal.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRSDA.2019040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

本文比较了不同基于部分距离搜索(PDS)的kNN分类器在用于网络入侵检测系统(NIDS)的京都2006+基准数据集上的性能。这些PDS分类器是基于特征索引来命名的。它们是:i)简单PDS kNN,即特征不被索引(SPDS); ii)基于方差索引的kNN (VIPDS),即通过特征的方差来对特征进行索引;iii)基于相关系数索引的kNN (CIPDS),即通过带有类标签的特征的相关系数来对特征进行索引。为了对这些分类器进行比较研究,计算时间和准确率被认为是性能指标。经过实验研究,CIPDS在计算时间上有更好的表现,而VIPDS在精度上有更好的表现,但与CIPDS相比差异不显著。本研究建议在类别标签无歧义的情况下采用CIPDS,否则建议采用VIPDS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of PDS Based kNN Classifiers on Kyoto Dataset
This article compares the performance of different Partial Distance Search-based (PDS) kNN classifiers on a benchmark Kyoto 2006+ dataset for Network Intrusion Detection Systems (NIDS). These PDS classifiers are named based on features indexing. They are: i) Simple PDS kNN, the features are not indexed (SPDS), ii) Variance indexing based kNN (VIPDS), the features are indexed by the variance of the features, and iii) Correlation coefficient indexing-based kNN (CIPDS), the features are indexed by the correlation coefficient of the features with a class label. For comparative study between these classifiers, the computational time and accuracy are considered performance measures. After the experimental study, it is observed that the CIPDS gives better performance in terms of computational time whereas VIPDS shows better accuracy, but not much significant difference when compared with CIPDS. The study suggests to adopt CIPDS when class labels were available without any ambiguity, otherwise it suggested the adoption of VIPDS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信