为了改善临床心理专家教育修炼制度的建议

양재원, 민병배, 김정호, 성태훈, 예영주, 이영준, 이원혜, 진주희, 최기홍, 최승원
{"title":"为了改善临床心理专家教育修炼制度的建议","authors":"양재원, 민병배, 김정호, 성태훈, 예영주, 이영준, 이원혜, 진주희, 최기홍, 최승원","doi":"10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical psychologists in Korea have continuously grown and becoming as leading experts in the field of mental health over the past fifty years. The number of clinical psychologists along with members of the Korean Clinical Psychology Association have increased. More importantly, recent changes in mental health system require expanded and broadened expertise of clinical psychologists from traditional psychiatric hospitals or University Counseling Centers based work. Accordingly, training systems for clinical psychologists should accommodate the changes in mental health system and societal needs. The present article aimed to critically evaluate the current clinical psychology training system, and to propose ideas to improve the training system. First, we defined expert areas of clinical psychologists in Korea based on theoretical underpinning of clinical psychology. Second, we suggested ways to expand the scope and number of training institutions to modify the selection process of clinical psychology trainees, and to protect the rights and responsibility of trainees. Third, we discussed the changes in required activities during the training, including contents of psychological assessments and treatments. Fourth, we discussed diversification of training models from a traditional scientist-practitioner model to a practitioner-scholar model and a clinical scientist model. Fifth, we discussed the necessity of continuing education beyond the requirement of acquiring a license to maintain the expertise and be up-to-date. Finally, we highlighted the importance of integration of science and clinical practice in the training system, and discussed how the goals could be achieved during the training. We expect that this article may pave the direction of further discussions for advancing the clinical psychology training system.","PeriodicalId":115450,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"임상심리전문가 교육수련제도 개선을 위한 제언\",\"authors\":\"양재원, 민병배, 김정호, 성태훈, 예영주, 이영준, 이원혜, 진주희, 최기홍, 최승원\",\"doi\":\"10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical psychologists in Korea have continuously grown and becoming as leading experts in the field of mental health over the past fifty years. The number of clinical psychologists along with members of the Korean Clinical Psychology Association have increased. More importantly, recent changes in mental health system require expanded and broadened expertise of clinical psychologists from traditional psychiatric hospitals or University Counseling Centers based work. Accordingly, training systems for clinical psychologists should accommodate the changes in mental health system and societal needs. The present article aimed to critically evaluate the current clinical psychology training system, and to propose ideas to improve the training system. First, we defined expert areas of clinical psychologists in Korea based on theoretical underpinning of clinical psychology. Second, we suggested ways to expand the scope and number of training institutions to modify the selection process of clinical psychology trainees, and to protect the rights and responsibility of trainees. Third, we discussed the changes in required activities during the training, including contents of psychological assessments and treatments. Fourth, we discussed diversification of training models from a traditional scientist-practitioner model to a practitioner-scholar model and a clinical scientist model. Fifth, we discussed the necessity of continuing education beyond the requirement of acquiring a license to maintain the expertise and be up-to-date. Finally, we highlighted the importance of integration of science and clinical practice in the training system, and discussed how the goals could be achieved during the training. We expect that this article may pave the direction of further discussions for advancing the clinical psychology training system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":115450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15842/kjcp.2017.36.1.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的50年里,韩国的临床心理学家不断成长,成为心理健康领域的顶尖专家。临床心理学家和韩国临床心理学会的会员也在增加。更重要的是,最近精神卫生系统的变化需要从传统精神病院或大学咨询中心拓展临床心理学家的专业知识。因此,临床心理学家的培训体系应适应心理卫生体系的变化和社会需求。本文旨在对现行临床心理学培训体系进行批判性评价,并提出完善培训体系的思路。首先,我们根据临床心理学的理论基础,界定了韩国临床心理学家的专家领域。二是建议扩大培训机构的范围和数量,修改临床心理学学员的选拔流程,保障学员的权利和责任。第三,我们讨论了培训期间所需活动的变化,包括心理评估和治疗的内容。第四,探讨了培养模式的多样化,从传统的科学家-医生模式向医生-学者模式和临床科学家模式转变。第五,我们讨论了继续教育的必要性,超出了获得执照以保持专业知识和与时俱进的要求。最后,我们强调了科学与临床实践相结合在培训体系中的重要性,并讨论了如何在培训过程中实现这些目标。希望本文能为进一步推进临床心理学培训体系的发展奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
임상심리전문가 교육수련제도 개선을 위한 제언
Clinical psychologists in Korea have continuously grown and becoming as leading experts in the field of mental health over the past fifty years. The number of clinical psychologists along with members of the Korean Clinical Psychology Association have increased. More importantly, recent changes in mental health system require expanded and broadened expertise of clinical psychologists from traditional psychiatric hospitals or University Counseling Centers based work. Accordingly, training systems for clinical psychologists should accommodate the changes in mental health system and societal needs. The present article aimed to critically evaluate the current clinical psychology training system, and to propose ideas to improve the training system. First, we defined expert areas of clinical psychologists in Korea based on theoretical underpinning of clinical psychology. Second, we suggested ways to expand the scope and number of training institutions to modify the selection process of clinical psychology trainees, and to protect the rights and responsibility of trainees. Third, we discussed the changes in required activities during the training, including contents of psychological assessments and treatments. Fourth, we discussed diversification of training models from a traditional scientist-practitioner model to a practitioner-scholar model and a clinical scientist model. Fifth, we discussed the necessity of continuing education beyond the requirement of acquiring a license to maintain the expertise and be up-to-date. Finally, we highlighted the importance of integration of science and clinical practice in the training system, and discussed how the goals could be achieved during the training. We expect that this article may pave the direction of further discussions for advancing the clinical psychology training system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信