为什么Pyeatte诉Pyeatte案可能是合同案例手册中最好的教学工具

EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic) Pub Date : 2017-07-25 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.3008973

Charles R. Calleros

{"title":"为什么Pyeatte诉Pyeatte案可能是合同案例手册中最好的教学工具","authors":"Charles R. Calleros","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3008973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author explains why a relatively obscure judicial opinion is among the best teaching tools in a contracts course. He invites other faculty to share their favorite judicial opinions for the classroom case method, either in a course on contracts or in other courses.","PeriodicalId":416511,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Pyeatte v. Pyeatte Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook\",\"authors\":\"Charles R. Calleros\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3008973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author explains why a relatively obscure judicial opinion is among the best teaching tools in a contracts course. He invites other faculty to share their favorite judicial opinions for the classroom case method, either in a course on contracts or in other courses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3008973\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3008973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

作者解释了为什么一个相对模糊的司法意见是合同课程中最好的教学工具之一。他邀请其他教员分享他们对课堂案例法的最喜欢的司法观点，无论是在关于合同的课程中还是在其他课程中。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Why Pyeatte v. Pyeatte Might Be the Best Teaching Tool in the Contracts Casebook

The author explains why a relatively obscure judicial opinion is among the best teaching tools in a contracts course. He invites other faculty to share their favorite judicial opinions for the classroom case method, either in a course on contracts or in other courses.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

EduRN: Legal Scholarship Education (LSN) (Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量