多体系统变步长集成的评估

M. Ruggiu, F. González
{"title":"多体系统变步长集成的评估","authors":"M. Ruggiu, F. González","doi":"10.3311/eccomasmbd2021-172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When performing the numerical integration of multibody systems (MBS) dynamics, the analyst can choose from a wide variety of methods and implementations. Selecting the most appropriate option for a particular application is not a straightforward task; as a consequence, several benchmark examples have been formulated by the MBS research community with the intent to assess the accuracy and performance of different solution methods when applied to certain kinds of mechanical problems. This paper introduces a variation of the slider-crank mechanism, already employed as benchmark problem in the MBS literature, intended to evaluate the performance of variable-step MBS algorithms. Three cases, featuring singular configurations and variable-frequency external actions, were defined. The example is used to illustrate some necessary elements in the definition of a benchmark problem and in the process of comparing different solution methods, as well as difficulties that can arise during this task. The proposed example was used to evaluate the behaviour of a variable-step index-3 augmented Lagrangian algorithm with velocity and acceleration projections, as well as other well-known solution methods.","PeriodicalId":431921,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on MULTIBODY DYNAMICS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of variable step-size integration of multibody systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Ruggiu, F. González\",\"doi\":\"10.3311/eccomasmbd2021-172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When performing the numerical integration of multibody systems (MBS) dynamics, the analyst can choose from a wide variety of methods and implementations. Selecting the most appropriate option for a particular application is not a straightforward task; as a consequence, several benchmark examples have been formulated by the MBS research community with the intent to assess the accuracy and performance of different solution methods when applied to certain kinds of mechanical problems. This paper introduces a variation of the slider-crank mechanism, already employed as benchmark problem in the MBS literature, intended to evaluate the performance of variable-step MBS algorithms. Three cases, featuring singular configurations and variable-frequency external actions, were defined. The example is used to illustrate some necessary elements in the definition of a benchmark problem and in the process of comparing different solution methods, as well as difficulties that can arise during this task. The proposed example was used to evaluate the behaviour of a variable-step index-3 augmented Lagrangian algorithm with velocity and acceleration projections, as well as other well-known solution methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on MULTIBODY DYNAMICS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 10th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on MULTIBODY DYNAMICS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3311/eccomasmbd2021-172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on MULTIBODY DYNAMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3311/eccomasmbd2021-172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当执行多体系统(MBS)动力学的数值积分时,分析人员可以从多种方法和实现中进行选择。为特定应用程序选择最合适的选项并不是一项简单的任务;因此,MBS研究界制定了几个基准示例,目的是评估应用于某些机械问题时不同解决方法的准确性和性能。本文介绍了一种已在MBS文献中作为基准问题的滑块-曲柄机构的变体,旨在评估变步长MBS算法的性能。定义了三种具有奇异结构和变频外部作用的情况。该示例用于说明基准问题的定义和比较不同解决方案方法过程中的一些必要元素,以及在此任务期间可能出现的困难。该实例用于评估具有速度和加速度投影的变步长指数-3增广拉格朗日算法的行为,以及其他已知的求解方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of variable step-size integration of multibody systems
When performing the numerical integration of multibody systems (MBS) dynamics, the analyst can choose from a wide variety of methods and implementations. Selecting the most appropriate option for a particular application is not a straightforward task; as a consequence, several benchmark examples have been formulated by the MBS research community with the intent to assess the accuracy and performance of different solution methods when applied to certain kinds of mechanical problems. This paper introduces a variation of the slider-crank mechanism, already employed as benchmark problem in the MBS literature, intended to evaluate the performance of variable-step MBS algorithms. Three cases, featuring singular configurations and variable-frequency external actions, were defined. The example is used to illustrate some necessary elements in the definition of a benchmark problem and in the process of comparing different solution methods, as well as difficulties that can arise during this task. The proposed example was used to evaluate the behaviour of a variable-step index-3 augmented Lagrangian algorithm with velocity and acceleration projections, as well as other well-known solution methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信