基于RSSI的几种距离室内定位技术性能比较

Dwi Joko Suroso, F. Y. M. Adiyatma, Ahmad Eko Kurniawan, P. Cherntanomwong
{"title":"基于RSSI的几种距离室内定位技术性能比较","authors":"Dwi Joko Suroso, F. Y. M. Adiyatma, Ahmad Eko Kurniawan, P. Cherntanomwong","doi":"10.21108/ijoict.v7i1.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The classical rang-based technique for position estimation is still reliably used for indoor localization. Trilateration and multilateration, which include three or more references to locate the indoor object, are two common examples. These techniques use at least three intersection-locations of the references' distance and conclude that the intersection is the object's position. However, some challenges have appeared when using a simple power-to-distance parameter, i.e., received signal strength indicator (RSSI). RSSI is known for its fluctuated values when used as the localization parameter. The improvement of classical range-based has been proposed, namely min-max and iRingLA algorithms. These algorithms or methods use the approximation in a bounding-box and rings for min-max and iRingLA, respectively. This paper discusses the comparison performance of min-max and iRingLA with multilateration as the classical method. We found that min-max gives the best performance, and in some positions, iRingLA gives the best accuracy error. Hence, the approximation method can be promising for indoor localization, especially when using a simple and straightforward RSSI parameter.","PeriodicalId":137090,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (IJoICT)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Several Range-based Techniques for Indoor Localization Based on RSSI\",\"authors\":\"Dwi Joko Suroso, F. Y. M. Adiyatma, Ahmad Eko Kurniawan, P. Cherntanomwong\",\"doi\":\"10.21108/ijoict.v7i1.550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The classical rang-based technique for position estimation is still reliably used for indoor localization. Trilateration and multilateration, which include three or more references to locate the indoor object, are two common examples. These techniques use at least three intersection-locations of the references' distance and conclude that the intersection is the object's position. However, some challenges have appeared when using a simple power-to-distance parameter, i.e., received signal strength indicator (RSSI). RSSI is known for its fluctuated values when used as the localization parameter. The improvement of classical range-based has been proposed, namely min-max and iRingLA algorithms. These algorithms or methods use the approximation in a bounding-box and rings for min-max and iRingLA, respectively. This paper discusses the comparison performance of min-max and iRingLA with multilateration as the classical method. We found that min-max gives the best performance, and in some positions, iRingLA gives the best accuracy error. Hence, the approximation method can be promising for indoor localization, especially when using a simple and straightforward RSSI parameter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (IJoICT)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (IJoICT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21108/ijoict.v7i1.550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on Information and Communication Technology (IJoICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21108/ijoict.v7i1.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

经典的基于距离的位置估计技术仍然可靠地用于室内定位。包括三个或更多的参考来定位室内物体的三边测量和多边测量是两个常见的例子。这些技术使用至少三个参考点距离的交点位置,并得出交点是物体位置的结论。然而,当使用简单的功率距离参数,即接收信号强度指示器(RSSI)时,出现了一些挑战。RSSI在用作定位参数时以其波动值而闻名。对经典的基于距离的算法进行了改进,即min-max和iRingLA算法。这些算法或方法分别对min-max和iRingLA使用边界框和环中的近似。本文讨论了以乘法为经典方法的最小-最大和iRingLA的性能比较。我们发现min-max给出了最好的性能,在某些位置,iRingLA给出了最好的精度误差。因此,近似方法可以用于室内定位,特别是当使用简单直接的RSSI参数时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of Several Range-based Techniques for Indoor Localization Based on RSSI
The classical rang-based technique for position estimation is still reliably used for indoor localization. Trilateration and multilateration, which include three or more references to locate the indoor object, are two common examples. These techniques use at least three intersection-locations of the references' distance and conclude that the intersection is the object's position. However, some challenges have appeared when using a simple power-to-distance parameter, i.e., received signal strength indicator (RSSI). RSSI is known for its fluctuated values when used as the localization parameter. The improvement of classical range-based has been proposed, namely min-max and iRingLA algorithms. These algorithms or methods use the approximation in a bounding-box and rings for min-max and iRingLA, respectively. This paper discusses the comparison performance of min-max and iRingLA with multilateration as the classical method. We found that min-max gives the best performance, and in some positions, iRingLA gives the best accuracy error. Hence, the approximation method can be promising for indoor localization, especially when using a simple and straightforward RSSI parameter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信