死亡隐喻的跨语言研究

Moses Gatambũki Gathigia, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo A. Minervino, F. Marmolejo‐Ramos
{"title":"死亡隐喻的跨语言研究","authors":"Moses Gatambũki Gathigia, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo A. Minervino, F. Marmolejo‐Ramos","doi":"10.1075/COGLS.00025.GAT","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The avoidance of directly addressing human mortality indicates fear of death. This fear elicits psychological, social and religious\n interdictions in language such that people resort to the use of metaphors to avoid confronting death. Under the premise that\n metaphor is a conceptual mapping from a concrete source to an abstract target domain, this study aims to identify and categorize\n euphemistic metaphors of death in six languages: Chinese, Farsi, Gĩkũyũ, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish. Those metaphors are\n interpreted via the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In doing so, 40 speakers in each of the languages were asked to complete a\n short questionnaire. Various metaphors of death were identified in each language and categorized into four conceptual metaphors:\n death is a journey; death is the end; death is a rest; and death is a summons. The key finding is that the\n most common metaphor of death is death is a journey. This holds across linguistic groups regardless of gender and age\n factors. This study also discusses the role of embodied cognition theories in accounting for how metaphors of death are created\n and their role within cognition in general.","PeriodicalId":127458,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","volume":"08 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death\",\"authors\":\"Moses Gatambũki Gathigia, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Carlos Tirado, Oksana Tsaregorodtseva, Omid Khatin-Zadeh, Ricardo A. Minervino, F. Marmolejo‐Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/COGLS.00025.GAT\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The avoidance of directly addressing human mortality indicates fear of death. This fear elicits psychological, social and religious\\n interdictions in language such that people resort to the use of metaphors to avoid confronting death. Under the premise that\\n metaphor is a conceptual mapping from a concrete source to an abstract target domain, this study aims to identify and categorize\\n euphemistic metaphors of death in six languages: Chinese, Farsi, Gĩkũyũ, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish. Those metaphors are\\n interpreted via the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In doing so, 40 speakers in each of the languages were asked to complete a\\n short questionnaire. Various metaphors of death were identified in each language and categorized into four conceptual metaphors:\\n death is a journey; death is the end; death is a rest; and death is a summons. The key finding is that the\\n most common metaphor of death is death is a journey. This holds across linguistic groups regardless of gender and age\\n factors. This study also discusses the role of embodied cognition theories in accounting for how metaphors of death are created\\n and their role within cognition in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":127458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Linguistic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00025.GAT\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Linguistic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/COGLS.00025.GAT","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

避免直接讨论人类死亡表明对死亡的恐惧。这种恐惧在语言上引发了心理、社会和宗教上的禁令,使人们诉诸于使用隐喻来避免面对死亡。本研究以隐喻为概念映射为前提,对汉语、波斯语、Gĩkũyũ、俄语、西班牙语和瑞典语六种语言中关于死亡的委婉隐喻进行识别和分类。这些隐喻是通过概念隐喻理论来解释的。为此,请每一种语文的40名发言者填写一份简短的调查表。在每种语言中都发现了各种各样的死亡隐喻,并将其分为四个概念隐喻:死亡是一次旅行;死亡是终结;死亡是一种安息;死亡是一种召唤。关键的发现是,最常见的死亡比喻是,死亡是一段旅程。无论性别和年龄因素如何,这一点在所有语言群体中都适用。本研究还讨论了具身认知理论在解释死亡隐喻如何产生及其在认知中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A cross-linguistic study of metaphors of death
The avoidance of directly addressing human mortality indicates fear of death. This fear elicits psychological, social and religious interdictions in language such that people resort to the use of metaphors to avoid confronting death. Under the premise that metaphor is a conceptual mapping from a concrete source to an abstract target domain, this study aims to identify and categorize euphemistic metaphors of death in six languages: Chinese, Farsi, Gĩkũyũ, Russian, Spanish, and Swedish. Those metaphors are interpreted via the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT). In doing so, 40 speakers in each of the languages were asked to complete a short questionnaire. Various metaphors of death were identified in each language and categorized into four conceptual metaphors: death is a journey; death is the end; death is a rest; and death is a summons. The key finding is that the most common metaphor of death is death is a journey. This holds across linguistic groups regardless of gender and age factors. This study also discusses the role of embodied cognition theories in accounting for how metaphors of death are created and their role within cognition in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信