国有企业在ICSID面前作为索赔人:布罗切斯检验正在退潮吗?

R. Mohtashami, Farouk El-Hosseny
{"title":"国有企业在ICSID面前作为索赔人:布罗切斯检验正在退潮吗?","authors":"R. Mohtashami, Farouk El-Hosseny","doi":"10.54648/bcdr2016034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"State-owned enterprises (SOEs) play an increasingly crucial role in the global economy as foreign investors. In principle, an SOE is a “juridical person” that may qualify as a “national of another Contracting State” within the meaning of Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. An SOE from an ICSID Contracting State that made an investment in another Contracting State should, a priori, be entitled to standing before the Centre. One of the lead drafters of the ICSID Convention, Aron Broches, confirmed that SOE claims against states under the Convention should be permissible provided that the SOE was not “acting as an agent for the government” or “discharging an essentially governmental function”. This statement has become known as the “Broches test”. This article examines recent decisions addressing the Broches test, and questions the extent to which the test is likely to preclude SOEs from standing before ICSID.","PeriodicalId":166341,"journal":{"name":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-Owned Enterprises as Claimants before ICSID: Is the Broches Test on the Ebb?\",\"authors\":\"R. Mohtashami, Farouk El-Hosseny\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/bcdr2016034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"State-owned enterprises (SOEs) play an increasingly crucial role in the global economy as foreign investors. In principle, an SOE is a “juridical person” that may qualify as a “national of another Contracting State” within the meaning of Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. An SOE from an ICSID Contracting State that made an investment in another Contracting State should, a priori, be entitled to standing before the Centre. One of the lead drafters of the ICSID Convention, Aron Broches, confirmed that SOE claims against states under the Convention should be permissible provided that the SOE was not “acting as an agent for the government” or “discharging an essentially governmental function”. This statement has become known as the “Broches test”. This article examines recent decisions addressing the Broches test, and questions the extent to which the test is likely to preclude SOEs from standing before ICSID.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCDR International Arbitration Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCDR International Arbitration Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2016034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

国有企业作为外国投资者在全球经济中发挥着越来越重要的作用。原则上,国有企业是一种“法人”,可能有资格成为ICSID公约第25条所指的“另一缔约国的国民”。一个ICSID缔约国的国有企业在另一个缔约国进行投资时,应优先有权在中心面前出庭。ICSID公约的主要起草者之一Aron Broches确认,只要国有企业不“作为政府的代理人”或“履行本质上的政府职能”,就应该允许国有企业根据《公约》向国家提出索赔。这种说法被称为“布洛切斯测试”。本文考察了最近有关Broches测试的决定,并质疑该测试可能在多大程度上排除国有企业在ICSID面前的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
State-Owned Enterprises as Claimants before ICSID: Is the Broches Test on the Ebb?
State-owned enterprises (SOEs) play an increasingly crucial role in the global economy as foreign investors. In principle, an SOE is a “juridical person” that may qualify as a “national of another Contracting State” within the meaning of Article 25 of the ICSID Convention. An SOE from an ICSID Contracting State that made an investment in another Contracting State should, a priori, be entitled to standing before the Centre. One of the lead drafters of the ICSID Convention, Aron Broches, confirmed that SOE claims against states under the Convention should be permissible provided that the SOE was not “acting as an agent for the government” or “discharging an essentially governmental function”. This statement has become known as the “Broches test”. This article examines recent decisions addressing the Broches test, and questions the extent to which the test is likely to preclude SOEs from standing before ICSID.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信