{"title":"美国制药公司的全球研发定位","authors":"S. Halfhill","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":235761,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global research and development positioning among US-based pharmaceutical companies\",\"authors\":\"S. Halfhill\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":235761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Global research and development positioning among US-based pharmaceutical companies
The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<>