美国制药公司的全球研发定位

S. Halfhill
{"title":"美国制药公司的全球研发定位","authors":"S. Halfhill","doi":"10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":235761,"journal":{"name":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global research and development positioning among US-based pharmaceutical companies\",\"authors\":\"S. Halfhill\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":235761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMC.1990.201309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作者探讨了14家跨国公司的主要战略特征,其中11家是世界上最大的20家制药公司之一。她表明,虽然在战略选择方面没有出现主导模式,但与全球分散的同行相比,以美国为重点的公司似乎不太可能参与多样化,后者更有可能使用针对仿制药和OTC产品开发的成本最小化战略。根据t检验统计数据,研发的全球分散程度在流动性、资产管理、债务管理和盈利能力等传统财务绩效指标中尚未显示出任何差异。然而,使用股东总回报的绩效衡量标准,美国焦点公司在1988年的表现优于全球分散公司,但在1984-8年的平均回报方面却没有。美国制药行业仍然专注于其研发活动,尽管其业务的其他价值活动在全球范围内分散得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Global research and development positioning among US-based pharmaceutical companies
The author explores the predominant strategic characteristics of fourteen multinational corporations eleven of which are among the twenty largest pharmaceutical firms world-wide. She shows that, while no dominant pattern emerges with respect to strategic choices, firms with a US focus appear less likely to be involved with diversification than their global dispersion counterparts, which are more likely to use a cost minimization strategy aimed at generic and OTC product development. The extent of global dispersion for R&D has not yet shown any difference in the traditional financial performance measures of liquidity, asset management, debt management and profitably, as determined by t-test statistics. However, using the performance measure of total return to shareholders, US focus firms outperformed global dispersion firms in 1988, but not in average returns for 1984-8. The US pharmaceutical industry is still US focused in its R&D activities, although much more globally dispersed in other value activities of its business.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信