共识集群

Nam Nguyen, R. Caruana
{"title":"共识集群","authors":"Nam Nguyen, R. Caruana","doi":"10.1109/ICDM.2007.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we address the problem of combining multiple clusterings without access to the underlying features of the data. This process is known in the literature as clustering ensembles, clustering aggregation, or consensus clustering. Consensus clustering yields a stable and robust final clustering that is in agreement with multiple clusterings. We find that an iterative EM-like method is remarkably effective for this problem. We present an iterative algorithm and its variations for finding clustering consensus. An extensive empirical study compares our proposed algorithms with eleven other consensus clustering methods on four data sets using three different clustering performance metrics. The experimental results show that the new ensemble clustering methods produce clusterings that are as good as, and often better than, these other methods.","PeriodicalId":233758,"journal":{"name":"Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"255","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consensus Clusterings\",\"authors\":\"Nam Nguyen, R. Caruana\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDM.2007.73\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we address the problem of combining multiple clusterings without access to the underlying features of the data. This process is known in the literature as clustering ensembles, clustering aggregation, or consensus clustering. Consensus clustering yields a stable and robust final clustering that is in agreement with multiple clusterings. We find that an iterative EM-like method is remarkably effective for this problem. We present an iterative algorithm and its variations for finding clustering consensus. An extensive empirical study compares our proposed algorithms with eleven other consensus clustering methods on four data sets using three different clustering performance metrics. The experimental results show that the new ensemble clustering methods produce clusterings that are as good as, and often better than, these other methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"255\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2007.73\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventh IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM.2007.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 255

摘要

在本文中,我们解决了组合多个聚类而不访问数据的底层特征的问题。这个过程在文献中被称为聚类集成、聚类聚集或一致聚类。共识聚类产生一个稳定和健壮的最终聚类,它与多个聚类一致。我们发现一种迭代的类em方法对于这个问题是非常有效的。我们提出了一种迭代算法及其变体来寻找聚类一致性。一项广泛的实证研究将我们提出的算法与其他十一种共识聚类方法在四个数据集上使用三种不同的聚类性能指标进行了比较。实验结果表明,新的集成聚类方法产生的聚类效果与其他方法一样好,甚至优于其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consensus Clusterings
In this paper we address the problem of combining multiple clusterings without access to the underlying features of the data. This process is known in the literature as clustering ensembles, clustering aggregation, or consensus clustering. Consensus clustering yields a stable and robust final clustering that is in agreement with multiple clusterings. We find that an iterative EM-like method is remarkably effective for this problem. We present an iterative algorithm and its variations for finding clustering consensus. An extensive empirical study compares our proposed algorithms with eleven other consensus clustering methods on four data sets using three different clustering performance metrics. The experimental results show that the new ensemble clustering methods produce clusterings that are as good as, and often better than, these other methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信