使用应力-强度模型验证安全仪表系统针对共因故障的多样性防御机制

Kai Wang, Aidong Xu, Hong Wang
{"title":"使用应力-强度模型验证安全仪表系统针对共因故障的多样性防御机制","authors":"Kai Wang, Aidong Xu, Hong Wang","doi":"10.1109/ICCECT.2012.201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Common cause failure (CCF) is a serious threat to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) reliability. It is therefore important to model and quantify CCF in reliability analysis. Diversity has long been used to protect redundant systems against CCF. Whilst there is clear evidence that diversity can bring benefits when compared with identical redundancy systems, these benefits can be difficult to quantify. Therefore, a novel CCF model which studies CCF from the viewpoint of Root Cause (RC) and Coupling Factor is proposed in this paper. The key parameters of the novel CCF model can be determined based on a stress-strength model by classifying variables of stressors and strengths according to RC categories. An application example is provided that illustrates how the proposed CCF model performs for a chemical reactor safety system (CRSS) for protection against high pressure and temperature. The results not only confirm that diversity techniques lower the CCF probability but also provide quantitative assessment of how large the improvements can be in different diversity techniques.","PeriodicalId":153613,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying Diversity Defense Mechanisms against Common Cause Failures for Safety Instrumented Systems Using a Stress-Strength Model\",\"authors\":\"Kai Wang, Aidong Xu, Hong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCECT.2012.201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Common cause failure (CCF) is a serious threat to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) reliability. It is therefore important to model and quantify CCF in reliability analysis. Diversity has long been used to protect redundant systems against CCF. Whilst there is clear evidence that diversity can bring benefits when compared with identical redundancy systems, these benefits can be difficult to quantify. Therefore, a novel CCF model which studies CCF from the viewpoint of Root Cause (RC) and Coupling Factor is proposed in this paper. The key parameters of the novel CCF model can be determined based on a stress-strength model by classifying variables of stressors and strengths according to RC categories. An application example is provided that illustrates how the proposed CCF model performs for a chemical reactor safety system (CRSS) for protection against high pressure and temperature. The results not only confirm that diversity techniques lower the CCF probability but also provide quantitative assessment of how large the improvements can be in different diversity techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCECT.2012.201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Control Engineering and Communication Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCECT.2012.201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

共因故障(CCF)严重威胁着安全仪表系统(SIS)的可靠性。因此,在可靠性分析中对CCF进行建模和量化是非常重要的。长期以来,多样性一直被用来保护冗余系统免受CCF的影响。虽然有明确的证据表明,与相同的冗余系统相比,多样性可以带来好处,但这些好处很难量化。为此,本文提出了一种从根本原因和耦合因子的角度研究CCF的新型CCF模型。基于应力-强度模型,将应力源和强度变量按RC分类,确定了新型CCF模型的关键参数。给出了一个应用实例,说明了所提出的CCF模型在化学反应堆安全系统(CRSS)中对高压和高温的保护效果。结果不仅证实了多样性技术降低了CCF概率,而且还提供了对不同多样性技术的改进程度的定量评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verifying Diversity Defense Mechanisms against Common Cause Failures for Safety Instrumented Systems Using a Stress-Strength Model
Common cause failure (CCF) is a serious threat to Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) reliability. It is therefore important to model and quantify CCF in reliability analysis. Diversity has long been used to protect redundant systems against CCF. Whilst there is clear evidence that diversity can bring benefits when compared with identical redundancy systems, these benefits can be difficult to quantify. Therefore, a novel CCF model which studies CCF from the viewpoint of Root Cause (RC) and Coupling Factor is proposed in this paper. The key parameters of the novel CCF model can be determined based on a stress-strength model by classifying variables of stressors and strengths according to RC categories. An application example is provided that illustrates how the proposed CCF model performs for a chemical reactor safety system (CRSS) for protection against high pressure and temperature. The results not only confirm that diversity techniques lower the CCF probability but also provide quantitative assessment of how large the improvements can be in different diversity techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信