{"title":"马尼帕医院预约和未预约妊娠的产妇并发症和围产儿结局","authors":"R. Tuladhar, J. Sharma","doi":"10.59881/jpeson4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The use of prenatal care prevents maternal complications and perinatal adverse outcomes by early identification of high risk pregnancies, assessment of growth and well being of the fetus, prompt diagnosis and management of complications, with safe delivery. \nObjectives: This study aims at comparing the obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in delivered booked and unbooked mothers to determine the correlation of booking status and maternal and perinatal outcome. \nMethodology: In this prospective study, 350 patients admitted for delivery at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara during March 2014 to May 2015 were included. Antenatal complications of the mothers, postnatal complications, neonatal outcome and the mode of delivery were compared amongst the booked and unbooked cases. \nResults: There was an increased prevalence of preeclampsia (6.3% in unbooked vs. 1.6% in booked); eclampsia (2.5% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); antepartum haemorrhage (5.06% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Preterm premature rupture of membrane (5.1% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Rh-isoimmunization (06% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); Intrauterine growth restriction (5.7% in unbooked vs. 3.6% in booked ); and Intrauterine fetal death (7.6% in unbooked vs. 0.5% in booked) in unbooked mothers as compared to booked mothers. The unbooked mothers were prone to postpartum hemorrhage (6.9% vs 2.6% in booked mothers). Assisted breech delivery and ventouse delivery were recorded higher in unbooked cases than in booked case (3.2% vs. 0.5% and 3.8% vs. 3.1% respectively). \nConclusion: The poorer maternal and fetal outcome in unbooked cases in comparison to booked cases can be reduced with the best utilization of the prenatal care. ","PeriodicalId":158871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perinatal Society of Nepal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maternal Complications and Perinatal Outcome in The Booked and Unbooked Cases of Pregnancy at Manipal Teaching Hospital\",\"authors\":\"R. Tuladhar, J. Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.59881/jpeson4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The use of prenatal care prevents maternal complications and perinatal adverse outcomes by early identification of high risk pregnancies, assessment of growth and well being of the fetus, prompt diagnosis and management of complications, with safe delivery. \\nObjectives: This study aims at comparing the obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in delivered booked and unbooked mothers to determine the correlation of booking status and maternal and perinatal outcome. \\nMethodology: In this prospective study, 350 patients admitted for delivery at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara during March 2014 to May 2015 were included. Antenatal complications of the mothers, postnatal complications, neonatal outcome and the mode of delivery were compared amongst the booked and unbooked cases. \\nResults: There was an increased prevalence of preeclampsia (6.3% in unbooked vs. 1.6% in booked); eclampsia (2.5% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); antepartum haemorrhage (5.06% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Preterm premature rupture of membrane (5.1% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Rh-isoimmunization (06% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); Intrauterine growth restriction (5.7% in unbooked vs. 3.6% in booked ); and Intrauterine fetal death (7.6% in unbooked vs. 0.5% in booked) in unbooked mothers as compared to booked mothers. The unbooked mothers were prone to postpartum hemorrhage (6.9% vs 2.6% in booked mothers). Assisted breech delivery and ventouse delivery were recorded higher in unbooked cases than in booked case (3.2% vs. 0.5% and 3.8% vs. 3.1% respectively). \\nConclusion: The poorer maternal and fetal outcome in unbooked cases in comparison to booked cases can be reduced with the best utilization of the prenatal care. \",\"PeriodicalId\":158871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Perinatal Society of Nepal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Perinatal Society of Nepal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59881/jpeson4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perinatal Society of Nepal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59881/jpeson4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
前言:产前护理可通过早期发现高危妊娠、评估胎儿生长和健康状况、及时诊断和处理并发症以及安全分娩来预防产妇并发症和围产期不良后果。目的:本研究旨在比较预约分娩和未预约分娩的产妇的产科并发症和围产儿结局,以确定预约状态与产妇和围产儿结局的相关性。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了2014年3月至2015年5月期间在博卡拉马尼帕尔教学医院住院分娩的350例患者。比较了预定和未预定病例中母亲的产前并发症、产后并发症、新生儿结局和分娩方式。结果:子痫前期患病率增加(未预约组为6.3%,预约组为1.6%);子痫(未预订组2.5%,预订组为零);产前出血(未预约者5.06%,预约者2.1%);早产胎膜早破(未预定组5.1% vs.预定组2.1%);rh等免疫(未登记为06%,登记为零);宫内生长受限(未登记5.7% vs.登记3.6%);未登记母亲的宫内胎儿死亡率(未登记母亲为7.6%,登记母亲为0.5%)与登记母亲相比。未预约的产妇易发生产后出血(6.9% vs . 2.6%)。辅助臀位分娩和静脉分娩在未预约病例中的记录高于预约病例(分别为3.2%对0.5%和3.8%对3.1%)。结论:通过充分利用产前护理,可降低未预约病例的母胎结局较预约病例差。
Maternal Complications and Perinatal Outcome in The Booked and Unbooked Cases of Pregnancy at Manipal Teaching Hospital
Introduction: The use of prenatal care prevents maternal complications and perinatal adverse outcomes by early identification of high risk pregnancies, assessment of growth and well being of the fetus, prompt diagnosis and management of complications, with safe delivery.
Objectives: This study aims at comparing the obstetrical complications and perinatal outcomes in delivered booked and unbooked mothers to determine the correlation of booking status and maternal and perinatal outcome.
Methodology: In this prospective study, 350 patients admitted for delivery at Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara during March 2014 to May 2015 were included. Antenatal complications of the mothers, postnatal complications, neonatal outcome and the mode of delivery were compared amongst the booked and unbooked cases.
Results: There was an increased prevalence of preeclampsia (6.3% in unbooked vs. 1.6% in booked); eclampsia (2.5% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); antepartum haemorrhage (5.06% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Preterm premature rupture of membrane (5.1% in unbooked vs. 2.1% in booked); Rh-isoimmunization (06% in unbooked vs. nil in booked); Intrauterine growth restriction (5.7% in unbooked vs. 3.6% in booked ); and Intrauterine fetal death (7.6% in unbooked vs. 0.5% in booked) in unbooked mothers as compared to booked mothers. The unbooked mothers were prone to postpartum hemorrhage (6.9% vs 2.6% in booked mothers). Assisted breech delivery and ventouse delivery were recorded higher in unbooked cases than in booked case (3.2% vs. 0.5% and 3.8% vs. 3.1% respectively).
Conclusion: The poorer maternal and fetal outcome in unbooked cases in comparison to booked cases can be reduced with the best utilization of the prenatal care.