基因组变异发现、解释和优先排序的生物信息学工作流程

O. U. Sezerman, Ege Ülgen, Nogayhan Seymen, I. M. Durasi
{"title":"基因组变异发现、解释和优先排序的生物信息学工作流程","authors":"O. U. Sezerman, Ege Ülgen, Nogayhan Seymen, I. M. Durasi","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques allow high-throughput detection of a vast amount of variations in a cost-efficient manner. However, there still are inconsistencies and debates about how to process and analyse this ‘ big data ’ . To accurately extract clinically relevant information from genomics data, choosing appropriate tools, knowing how to best utilize them and interpreting the results correctly is crucial. This chapter reviews state-of-the-art bioinformatics approaches in clinically relevant genomic variant detection. Best practices of reads-to-variant discovery workflows for germline and somatic short genomic variants are presented along with the most commonly utilized tools for each step. Additionally, methods for detecting structural variations are overviewed. Finally, approaches and current guidelines for clinical interpretation of genomic variants are discussed. As emphasized in this chapter, data processing and variant discovery steps are relatively well-understood. The differences in prioritization algorithms on the other hand can be perplexing, thus creating a bottleneck during interpretation. This review aims to shed light on the pros and cons of these differences to help experts give more informed decisions.","PeriodicalId":301810,"journal":{"name":"Bioinformatics Tools for Detection and Clinical Interpretation of Genomic Variations","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioinformatics Workflows for Genomic Variant Discovery, Interpretation and Prioritization\",\"authors\":\"O. U. Sezerman, Ege Ülgen, Nogayhan Seymen, I. M. Durasi\",\"doi\":\"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques allow high-throughput detection of a vast amount of variations in a cost-efficient manner. However, there still are inconsistencies and debates about how to process and analyse this ‘ big data ’ . To accurately extract clinically relevant information from genomics data, choosing appropriate tools, knowing how to best utilize them and interpreting the results correctly is crucial. This chapter reviews state-of-the-art bioinformatics approaches in clinically relevant genomic variant detection. Best practices of reads-to-variant discovery workflows for germline and somatic short genomic variants are presented along with the most commonly utilized tools for each step. Additionally, methods for detecting structural variations are overviewed. Finally, approaches and current guidelines for clinical interpretation of genomic variants are discussed. As emphasized in this chapter, data processing and variant discovery steps are relatively well-understood. The differences in prioritization algorithms on the other hand can be perplexing, thus creating a bottleneck during interpretation. This review aims to shed light on the pros and cons of these differences to help experts give more informed decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":301810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioinformatics Tools for Detection and Clinical Interpretation of Genomic Variations\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioinformatics Tools for Detection and Clinical Interpretation of Genomic Variations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinformatics Tools for Detection and Clinical Interpretation of Genomic Variations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.85524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

下一代测序(NGS)技术允许以经济高效的方式对大量变异进行高通量检测。然而,关于如何处理和分析这些“大数据”,仍然存在不一致和争论。为了从基因组学数据中准确提取临床相关信息,选择合适的工具,了解如何最好地利用它们并正确解释结果是至关重要的。本章回顾了临床相关基因组变异检测中最先进的生物信息学方法。介绍了生殖系和体细胞短基因组变异的从读取到变体发现工作流程的最佳实践,以及每个步骤中最常用的工具。此外,还概述了检测结构变化的方法。最后,方法和目前的指导方针的临床解释基因组变异进行了讨论。正如本章所强调的,数据处理和变体发现步骤相对来说已经很好理解了。另一方面,优先排序算法的差异可能令人困惑,从而在解释期间造成瓶颈。这篇综述旨在阐明这些差异的利弊,以帮助专家做出更明智的决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bioinformatics Workflows for Genomic Variant Discovery, Interpretation and Prioritization
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques allow high-throughput detection of a vast amount of variations in a cost-efficient manner. However, there still are inconsistencies and debates about how to process and analyse this ‘ big data ’ . To accurately extract clinically relevant information from genomics data, choosing appropriate tools, knowing how to best utilize them and interpreting the results correctly is crucial. This chapter reviews state-of-the-art bioinformatics approaches in clinically relevant genomic variant detection. Best practices of reads-to-variant discovery workflows for germline and somatic short genomic variants are presented along with the most commonly utilized tools for each step. Additionally, methods for detecting structural variations are overviewed. Finally, approaches and current guidelines for clinical interpretation of genomic variants are discussed. As emphasized in this chapter, data processing and variant discovery steps are relatively well-understood. The differences in prioritization algorithms on the other hand can be perplexing, thus creating a bottleneck during interpretation. This review aims to shed light on the pros and cons of these differences to help experts give more informed decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信