混合-自动驾驶系统的研究成果

{"title":"混合-自动驾驶系统的研究成果","authors":"","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-7316-7.ch012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this chapter, the authors use a set of use cases to evaluate how the hybrid autoML system is used to achieve the goals set out in the aims and objectives of this research. The authors map each use case to their aims and contributions as outlined in Section 1.3 of this research. A performance comparison is also made between autoWeka and the hybrid autoML system on 33 datasets. The comparison is carried out based on three main evaluation metrics such as the percentage accuracy (or correlation coefficient where applicable), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the time (in seconds) spent building the model on training data. It is observed that the hybrid autoML system fully outperforms autoWeka with regards to the time spent on building models or finding the best algorithms in the first instance.","PeriodicalId":134297,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning in Cancer Research With Applications in Colon Cancer and Big Data Analysis","volume":"380 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Output for the Hybrid-AutoML System\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/978-1-7998-7316-7.ch012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this chapter, the authors use a set of use cases to evaluate how the hybrid autoML system is used to achieve the goals set out in the aims and objectives of this research. The authors map each use case to their aims and contributions as outlined in Section 1.3 of this research. A performance comparison is also made between autoWeka and the hybrid autoML system on 33 datasets. The comparison is carried out based on three main evaluation metrics such as the percentage accuracy (or correlation coefficient where applicable), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the time (in seconds) spent building the model on training data. It is observed that the hybrid autoML system fully outperforms autoWeka with regards to the time spent on building models or finding the best algorithms in the first instance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Machine Learning in Cancer Research With Applications in Colon Cancer and Big Data Analysis\",\"volume\":\"380 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Machine Learning in Cancer Research With Applications in Colon Cancer and Big Data Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7316-7.ch012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning in Cancer Research With Applications in Colon Cancer and Big Data Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7316-7.ch012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本章中,作者使用了一组用例来评估如何使用混合autoML系统来实现本研究的目的和目标中设定的目标。作者将每个用例映射到他们的目标和贡献,如本研究的第1.3节所述。在33个数据集上对autoWeka和混合autoML系统进行了性能比较。比较是基于三个主要的评估指标进行的,比如百分比准确率(或相关系数,如果适用),平均绝对误差(MAE),以及在训练数据上构建模型所花费的时间(以秒为单位)。可以观察到,混合autoML系统在构建模型或在第一个实例中找到最佳算法的时间方面完全优于autoWeka。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Output for the Hybrid-AutoML System
In this chapter, the authors use a set of use cases to evaluate how the hybrid autoML system is used to achieve the goals set out in the aims and objectives of this research. The authors map each use case to their aims and contributions as outlined in Section 1.3 of this research. A performance comparison is also made between autoWeka and the hybrid autoML system on 33 datasets. The comparison is carried out based on three main evaluation metrics such as the percentage accuracy (or correlation coefficient where applicable), the mean absolute error (MAE), and the time (in seconds) spent building the model on training data. It is observed that the hybrid autoML system fully outperforms autoWeka with regards to the time spent on building models or finding the best algorithms in the first instance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信