{"title":"通过近似包容-排除公式学习DNF","authors":"J. Tarui, Tatsuie Tsukiji","doi":"10.1109/CCC.1999.766279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We analyze upper and lower bounds on size of Boolean conjunctions necessary and sufficient to approximate a given DNF formula by accuracy slightly better than 1/2 (here we define the size of a Boolean conjunction as the number of distinct variables on which it depends). Such an analysis determines the performance of a naive search algorithm that exhausts Boolean conjunctions in the order of their sizes. In fact, our analysis does not depend on kinds of symmetric functions to be exhausted: instead of conjunctions, counting either disjunctions, parity functions, majority functions, or even general symmetric functions, derives the same learning results from similar analyses.","PeriodicalId":432015,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317)","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning DNF by approximating inclusion-exclusion formulae\",\"authors\":\"J. Tarui, Tatsuie Tsukiji\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCC.1999.766279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We analyze upper and lower bounds on size of Boolean conjunctions necessary and sufficient to approximate a given DNF formula by accuracy slightly better than 1/2 (here we define the size of a Boolean conjunction as the number of distinct variables on which it depends). Such an analysis determines the performance of a naive search algorithm that exhausts Boolean conjunctions in the order of their sizes. In fact, our analysis does not depend on kinds of symmetric functions to be exhausted: instead of conjunctions, counting either disjunctions, parity functions, majority functions, or even general symmetric functions, derives the same learning results from similar analyses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317)\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.1999.766279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Fourteenth Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (Formerly: Structure in Complexity Theory Conference) (Cat.No.99CB36317)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCC.1999.766279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning DNF by approximating inclusion-exclusion formulae
We analyze upper and lower bounds on size of Boolean conjunctions necessary and sufficient to approximate a given DNF formula by accuracy slightly better than 1/2 (here we define the size of a Boolean conjunction as the number of distinct variables on which it depends). Such an analysis determines the performance of a naive search algorithm that exhausts Boolean conjunctions in the order of their sizes. In fact, our analysis does not depend on kinds of symmetric functions to be exhausted: instead of conjunctions, counting either disjunctions, parity functions, majority functions, or even general symmetric functions, derives the same learning results from similar analyses.