Young Choon Lee, Jayden King, Young Ki Kim, Seok-Hee Hong
{"title":"大规模分布式系统的鲁棒调度","authors":"Young Choon Lee, Jayden King, Young Ki Kim, Seok-Hee Hong","doi":"10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In large-scale distributed systems, such as clouds, failures are rather the norm than the exception. These failures include job failures, server failures, network outage and power failure. Among them, server failures are most common. With the wide adoption of cloud computing, the impact of server failures in clouds is far greater than that in traditional computer clusters as jobs of different tenants are often co-located (multi-tenancy). In this paper, we address the problem of robust scheduling, with realistic failure modeling, to minimize such impact on the execution of (co-located) jobs. To this end, we develop four online failure-aware (FA) scheduling algorithms, FAFF-WJ, FAFF-FC, FABF-WJ and FABF-FC, considering the availability and reliability of servers. In particular, FF (First-Fit) and BF (Best-Fit) indicate how the availability of servers is checked while WJ (Waiting Job) and FC (Failure Count) differ primarily in whether the reliability is measured from job's perspective or server's perspective. All four algorithms are designed essentially by combining these availability and reliability check methods. We evaluate our scheduling algorithms with failures generated based on our failure modeling of six real-world server failure traces. Our evaluation results show the effectiveness of our scheduling algorithms in robust job execution, with respect to both performance and cost.","PeriodicalId":221956,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust Scheduling for Large-Scale Distributed Systems\",\"authors\":\"Young Choon Lee, Jayden King, Young Ki Kim, Seok-Hee Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In large-scale distributed systems, such as clouds, failures are rather the norm than the exception. These failures include job failures, server failures, network outage and power failure. Among them, server failures are most common. With the wide adoption of cloud computing, the impact of server failures in clouds is far greater than that in traditional computer clusters as jobs of different tenants are often co-located (multi-tenancy). In this paper, we address the problem of robust scheduling, with realistic failure modeling, to minimize such impact on the execution of (co-located) jobs. To this end, we develop four online failure-aware (FA) scheduling algorithms, FAFF-WJ, FAFF-FC, FABF-WJ and FABF-FC, considering the availability and reliability of servers. In particular, FF (First-Fit) and BF (Best-Fit) indicate how the availability of servers is checked while WJ (Waiting Job) and FC (Failure Count) differ primarily in whether the reliability is measured from job's perspective or server's perspective. All four algorithms are designed essentially by combining these availability and reliability check methods. We evaluate our scheduling algorithms with failures generated based on our failure modeling of six real-world server failure traces. Our evaluation results show the effectiveness of our scheduling algorithms in robust job execution, with respect to both performance and cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":221956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE 19th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TrustCom50675.2020.00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Robust Scheduling for Large-Scale Distributed Systems
In large-scale distributed systems, such as clouds, failures are rather the norm than the exception. These failures include job failures, server failures, network outage and power failure. Among them, server failures are most common. With the wide adoption of cloud computing, the impact of server failures in clouds is far greater than that in traditional computer clusters as jobs of different tenants are often co-located (multi-tenancy). In this paper, we address the problem of robust scheduling, with realistic failure modeling, to minimize such impact on the execution of (co-located) jobs. To this end, we develop four online failure-aware (FA) scheduling algorithms, FAFF-WJ, FAFF-FC, FABF-WJ and FABF-FC, considering the availability and reliability of servers. In particular, FF (First-Fit) and BF (Best-Fit) indicate how the availability of servers is checked while WJ (Waiting Job) and FC (Failure Count) differ primarily in whether the reliability is measured from job's perspective or server's perspective. All four algorithms are designed essentially by combining these availability and reliability check methods. We evaluate our scheduling algorithms with failures generated based on our failure modeling of six real-world server failure traces. Our evaluation results show the effectiveness of our scheduling algorithms in robust job execution, with respect to both performance and cost.