高岭土ACT与抑蛋白素在先天性心脏手术中的应用比较

J. Ecklund, M. McCall, R. Southworth, M. Blackwell, J. Riley
{"title":"高岭土ACT与抑蛋白素在先天性心脏手术中的应用比较","authors":"J. Ecklund, M. McCall, R. Southworth, M. Blackwell, J. Riley","doi":"10.1051/ject/1996283123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between July 1994 and January 1995, ten patients underwent reoperative cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass for correction of various congenital anomalies. The patients' ages ranged from 0.17 to 34 years. Aprotinin was used according to surgeon protocol (200 mg/m2 body surface area initial loading dose and in pump prime, and 50 mg/m2 hourly infusion). The purpose of this study was to compare the simultaneous ACT values obtained from the Hemotec cartridge and the Hemochron kaolin tube.\nA 3 ml blood sample was drawn and duplicate ACTs run at four time periods during the procedure: 2 ml in a prewarmed kaolin Hemochron tube and 0.4 ml in each well of a pre-warmed Hemotec cartridge. Information recorded at each time period included: event [pre-CPB, onCPB hypothermia, on-CPB rewarming, post-CPB], temperature, and ACT values from each machine. A total of 74 paired samples were analyzed. Two-way ANOV A was used to compare the values. Multiple comparison tests using the Bonferonni method were performed to maintain the Type I error rate at 0.05. Regression, correlation, and residual analyses were performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess the degree of agreement between the two devices.\nThere was a statistically significant difference between the ACT values obtained between the two devices (p<.01); however, the correlation between the values was high and significant (r=0.841, p<.01). The Hemotec was an average of 86 seconds lower than the Hemochron. The kappa statistic was 0.688, which indicates good agreement. The differences between these two devices have been previously reported using the celite Hemochron tubes, and it appears that there is still a difference when both tubes contain kaolin. Differences in the method of clot detection, differences in sample volume, and differences in the adsorption of aprotinin may explain the differences observed in this study. The Hemochron kaolin ACT is an acceptable alternative to the Hemotec ACT for monitoring heparinization when aprotinin is in use in congenital heart surgery.","PeriodicalId":309024,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemochron vs. Hemotec Kaolin ACT Comparison with Aprotinin Use in Congenital Heart Surgery\",\"authors\":\"J. Ecklund, M. McCall, R. Southworth, M. Blackwell, J. Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1051/ject/1996283123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between July 1994 and January 1995, ten patients underwent reoperative cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass for correction of various congenital anomalies. The patients' ages ranged from 0.17 to 34 years. Aprotinin was used according to surgeon protocol (200 mg/m2 body surface area initial loading dose and in pump prime, and 50 mg/m2 hourly infusion). The purpose of this study was to compare the simultaneous ACT values obtained from the Hemotec cartridge and the Hemochron kaolin tube.\\nA 3 ml blood sample was drawn and duplicate ACTs run at four time periods during the procedure: 2 ml in a prewarmed kaolin Hemochron tube and 0.4 ml in each well of a pre-warmed Hemotec cartridge. Information recorded at each time period included: event [pre-CPB, onCPB hypothermia, on-CPB rewarming, post-CPB], temperature, and ACT values from each machine. A total of 74 paired samples were analyzed. Two-way ANOV A was used to compare the values. Multiple comparison tests using the Bonferonni method were performed to maintain the Type I error rate at 0.05. Regression, correlation, and residual analyses were performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess the degree of agreement between the two devices.\\nThere was a statistically significant difference between the ACT values obtained between the two devices (p<.01); however, the correlation between the values was high and significant (r=0.841, p<.01). The Hemotec was an average of 86 seconds lower than the Hemochron. The kappa statistic was 0.688, which indicates good agreement. The differences between these two devices have been previously reported using the celite Hemochron tubes, and it appears that there is still a difference when both tubes contain kaolin. Differences in the method of clot detection, differences in sample volume, and differences in the adsorption of aprotinin may explain the differences observed in this study. The Hemochron kaolin ACT is an acceptable alternative to the Hemotec ACT for monitoring heparinization when aprotinin is in use in congenital heart surgery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1996283123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/1996283123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

1994年7月至1995年1月期间,10名患者接受了心脏再手术和体外循环,以纠正各种先天性异常。患者年龄0.17 ~ 34岁。根据外科医生方案使用抑酶蛋白(200 mg/m2体表面积初始负荷剂量和泵启动,50 mg/m2每小时输注)。本研究的目的是比较从hemtec药筒和hemchron高岭土管同时获得的ACT值。抽取3ml血液样本,并在过程中在四个时间段重复ACTs: 2ml在预热的高岭土血色素管中,0.4 ml在预热的血色素管中。每个时间段记录的信息包括:每台机器的事件[cpb前、cpb后低温、cpb后复温]、温度和ACT值。共分析74个配对样本。采用双向ANOV分析进行数值比较。采用Bonferonni法进行多次比较检验,将I型错误率维持在0.05。进行回归分析、相关分析和残差分析。Cohen's kappa统计值用于评估两种设备之间的一致程度。两种装置的ACT值差异有统计学意义(p< 0.01);但两者间相关性高且显著(r=0.841, p< 0.01)。hemtec比hemchron平均慢86秒。kappa统计量为0.688,一致性较好。这两种装置之间的差异之前已经报道过使用celite haemchron管,并且当两种管都含有高岭土时,似乎仍然存在差异。血块检测方法的差异、样品体积的差异以及抑肽酶吸附的差异可能解释了本研究中观察到的差异。当在先天性心脏手术中使用抑肽酶时,血色素高岭土ACT是一种可接受的替代血色素ACT来监测肝素化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemochron vs. Hemotec Kaolin ACT Comparison with Aprotinin Use in Congenital Heart Surgery
Between July 1994 and January 1995, ten patients underwent reoperative cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass for correction of various congenital anomalies. The patients' ages ranged from 0.17 to 34 years. Aprotinin was used according to surgeon protocol (200 mg/m2 body surface area initial loading dose and in pump prime, and 50 mg/m2 hourly infusion). The purpose of this study was to compare the simultaneous ACT values obtained from the Hemotec cartridge and the Hemochron kaolin tube. A 3 ml blood sample was drawn and duplicate ACTs run at four time periods during the procedure: 2 ml in a prewarmed kaolin Hemochron tube and 0.4 ml in each well of a pre-warmed Hemotec cartridge. Information recorded at each time period included: event [pre-CPB, onCPB hypothermia, on-CPB rewarming, post-CPB], temperature, and ACT values from each machine. A total of 74 paired samples were analyzed. Two-way ANOV A was used to compare the values. Multiple comparison tests using the Bonferonni method were performed to maintain the Type I error rate at 0.05. Regression, correlation, and residual analyses were performed. Cohen's kappa statistic was used to assess the degree of agreement between the two devices. There was a statistically significant difference between the ACT values obtained between the two devices (p<.01); however, the correlation between the values was high and significant (r=0.841, p<.01). The Hemotec was an average of 86 seconds lower than the Hemochron. The kappa statistic was 0.688, which indicates good agreement. The differences between these two devices have been previously reported using the celite Hemochron tubes, and it appears that there is still a difference when both tubes contain kaolin. Differences in the method of clot detection, differences in sample volume, and differences in the adsorption of aprotinin may explain the differences observed in this study. The Hemochron kaolin ACT is an acceptable alternative to the Hemotec ACT for monitoring heparinization when aprotinin is in use in congenital heart surgery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信