病耻感和自尊

K. Lippert‐Rasmussen
{"title":"病耻感和自尊","authors":"K. Lippert‐Rasmussen","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the objection that the intended beneficiaries of affirmative action are harmed through its stigmatizing effects and, thus, that affirmative action is self-defeating. It offers three main reasons why this objection is weak. First, it seems likely that stigma is not merely a matter of rational statistical inferences but also a matter of irrational processes such as implicit bias, the sheer numbers effect, etc. Second, much stigma is likely to reflect epistemic injustice, e.g. recipients of affirmative action are likely to suffer from comparative and non-comparative epistemic injustice in the form of overgeneralizations to a higher degree than other groups. Hence, the stigma objection provides no objection to affirmative action schemes that also involve means to eliminate the relevant epistemic injustice. This relates to the chapter’s third point, which is that affirmative action policies can be part of a larger package of policies that, taken as a whole, is immune to the stigma objection.","PeriodicalId":365406,"journal":{"name":"Making Sense of Affirmative Action","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stigma and self-esteem\",\"authors\":\"K. Lippert‐Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at the objection that the intended beneficiaries of affirmative action are harmed through its stigmatizing effects and, thus, that affirmative action is self-defeating. It offers three main reasons why this objection is weak. First, it seems likely that stigma is not merely a matter of rational statistical inferences but also a matter of irrational processes such as implicit bias, the sheer numbers effect, etc. Second, much stigma is likely to reflect epistemic injustice, e.g. recipients of affirmative action are likely to suffer from comparative and non-comparative epistemic injustice in the form of overgeneralizations to a higher degree than other groups. Hence, the stigma objection provides no objection to affirmative action schemes that also involve means to eliminate the relevant epistemic injustice. This relates to the chapter’s third point, which is that affirmative action policies can be part of a larger package of policies that, taken as a whole, is immune to the stigma objection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":365406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Making Sense of Affirmative Action\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Making Sense of Affirmative Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Making Sense of Affirmative Action","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190648787.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章着眼于平权行动的预期受益者因其污名化效应而受到伤害的反对意见,因此,平权行动是自我挫败的。它提供了三个主要原因来解释为什么这种反对意见是站不住脚的。首先,污名似乎不仅仅是一个理性统计推断的问题,也是一个非理性过程的问题,比如内隐偏见、绝对数量效应等。其次,许多污名化可能反映了认识上的不公正,例如,平权行动的接受者可能比其他群体更容易以过度概括的形式遭受比较和非比较认识上的不公正。因此,污名化反对并不反对平权行动计划,它也涉及消除相关认知不公正的手段。这与本章的第三点有关,即平权行动政策可以作为更大的一揽子政策的一部分,作为一个整体,不受污名反对的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stigma and self-esteem
This chapter looks at the objection that the intended beneficiaries of affirmative action are harmed through its stigmatizing effects and, thus, that affirmative action is self-defeating. It offers three main reasons why this objection is weak. First, it seems likely that stigma is not merely a matter of rational statistical inferences but also a matter of irrational processes such as implicit bias, the sheer numbers effect, etc. Second, much stigma is likely to reflect epistemic injustice, e.g. recipients of affirmative action are likely to suffer from comparative and non-comparative epistemic injustice in the form of overgeneralizations to a higher degree than other groups. Hence, the stigma objection provides no objection to affirmative action schemes that also involve means to eliminate the relevant epistemic injustice. This relates to the chapter’s third point, which is that affirmative action policies can be part of a larger package of policies that, taken as a whole, is immune to the stigma objection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信