{"title":"奥巴马,世贸组织贸易执法和中国","authors":"Stuart S. Malawer","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2798810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This year, President Obama claimed that since he entered office in 2009, his administration filed 20 WTO cases and won every one that was decided. This certainly sounds like a great achievement for U.S. trade enforcement that would reflect a sterling record in the WTO dispute resolution system. But is it a great achievement? It might be, but it is not the whole story. The whole story is much more nuanced and important to understand.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obama, WTO Trade Enforcement, and China\",\"authors\":\"Stuart S. Malawer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2798810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This year, President Obama claimed that since he entered office in 2009, his administration filed 20 WTO cases and won every one that was decided. This certainly sounds like a great achievement for U.S. trade enforcement that would reflect a sterling record in the WTO dispute resolution system. But is it a great achievement? It might be, but it is not the whole story. The whole story is much more nuanced and important to understand.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2798810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2798810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This year, President Obama claimed that since he entered office in 2009, his administration filed 20 WTO cases and won every one that was decided. This certainly sounds like a great achievement for U.S. trade enforcement that would reflect a sterling record in the WTO dispute resolution system. But is it a great achievement? It might be, but it is not the whole story. The whole story is much more nuanced and important to understand.