LSTM模型结合各种GARCH模型在股票预测中的性能和误差分析

Junqing Chen, Ying Yang, Renzhe Zhu, Tianlei Zhu, Zheng Tao
{"title":"LSTM模型结合各种GARCH模型在股票预测中的性能和误差分析","authors":"Junqing Chen, Ying Yang, Renzhe Zhu, Tianlei Zhu, Zheng Tao","doi":"10.1117/12.2670293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volatility is a measure of the asset return rate's estimated level of uncertainty and may be used to assess the riskiness of financial assets. We use the market capitalization of 200 stocks representing Korea as the primary analytical aim and evaluate the accuracy between them by analyzing the impacts of different hybrid models' hybrid neural networks, which are based on the returns of the KOSPI 200 stock index. By measuring the effectiveness of these models using four dissimilarity measures, we contrasted the performance of hybrid models that combine a single neural network and a single GARCH type model with that of hybrid neural networks that combine multiple GARCH models (MAE, MSE, HMAE, and HMSE). They are applied to anticipate the KOSPI 200 index data's actual volatility. Among these, hybrid neural networks that integrate more than one GARCH-type model have much better forecasting performance than neural network models that mix two or more or more GARCH-type models. GW-LSTM makes the least accurate forecast. We note that the hybrid model combining the three GARCH models shows a minor increase in predicting ability based on merging two and three models.","PeriodicalId":143377,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Green Communication, Network, and Internet of Things","volume":"12586 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The performance and error analysis of LSTM model combined with various GARCH models in stock forecasting\",\"authors\":\"Junqing Chen, Ying Yang, Renzhe Zhu, Tianlei Zhu, Zheng Tao\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2670293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Volatility is a measure of the asset return rate's estimated level of uncertainty and may be used to assess the riskiness of financial assets. We use the market capitalization of 200 stocks representing Korea as the primary analytical aim and evaluate the accuracy between them by analyzing the impacts of different hybrid models' hybrid neural networks, which are based on the returns of the KOSPI 200 stock index. By measuring the effectiveness of these models using four dissimilarity measures, we contrasted the performance of hybrid models that combine a single neural network and a single GARCH type model with that of hybrid neural networks that combine multiple GARCH models (MAE, MSE, HMAE, and HMSE). They are applied to anticipate the KOSPI 200 index data's actual volatility. Among these, hybrid neural networks that integrate more than one GARCH-type model have much better forecasting performance than neural network models that mix two or more or more GARCH-type models. GW-LSTM makes the least accurate forecast. We note that the hybrid model combining the three GARCH models shows a minor increase in predicting ability based on merging two and three models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Green Communication, Network, and Internet of Things\",\"volume\":\"12586 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Green Communication, Network, and Internet of Things\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Green Communication, Network, and Internet of Things","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2670293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

波动率是衡量资产收益率的估计不确定性水平,可用于评估金融资产的风险。我们以代表韩国的200只股票的市值作为主要分析目标,并通过分析不同混合模型的混合神经网络的影响来评估它们之间的准确性,这些模型基于KOSPI 200指数的回报。通过使用四种不同度量来衡量这些模型的有效性,我们对比了结合单个神经网络和单个GARCH类型模型的混合模型与结合多个GARCH模型(MAE、MSE、HMAE和HMSE)的混合神经网络的性能。它们被应用于预测KOSPI 200指数数据的实际波动。其中,集成一个以上garch型模型的混合神经网络比混合两个或多个garch型模型的神经网络具有更好的预测性能。GW-LSTM预报精度最低。我们注意到,结合三个GARCH模型的混合模型在合并两个模型和三个模型的基础上,预测能力略有提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The performance and error analysis of LSTM model combined with various GARCH models in stock forecasting
Volatility is a measure of the asset return rate's estimated level of uncertainty and may be used to assess the riskiness of financial assets. We use the market capitalization of 200 stocks representing Korea as the primary analytical aim and evaluate the accuracy between them by analyzing the impacts of different hybrid models' hybrid neural networks, which are based on the returns of the KOSPI 200 stock index. By measuring the effectiveness of these models using four dissimilarity measures, we contrasted the performance of hybrid models that combine a single neural network and a single GARCH type model with that of hybrid neural networks that combine multiple GARCH models (MAE, MSE, HMAE, and HMSE). They are applied to anticipate the KOSPI 200 index data's actual volatility. Among these, hybrid neural networks that integrate more than one GARCH-type model have much better forecasting performance than neural network models that mix two or more or more GARCH-type models. GW-LSTM makes the least accurate forecast. We note that the hybrid model combining the three GARCH models shows a minor increase in predicting ability based on merging two and three models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信