{"title":"注册护士共享治理感知指标与专业护理治理工具共享治理感知","authors":"S. Sajan","doi":"10.21522/TIJNR.2015.05.02.ART008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study explores how registered nurses perceive shared governance and how they implement in their workplace, especially on how they lead or how they are being led. The analyses of survey data provide us with valuable information specific to nurse's perceptions in a different work environment. It might forecast aid in innovative decision-making processes. Method: A descriptive survey with Hess Index of professional nursing governance was used in the study. All RNs working on the clinical side and in the administrative area are selected to participate in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Data analysis in the study revealed RN s perception towards the type of governance was determined by the mean score and find out that shared governance is practiced as per the guidelines set up by the IPNG Tool. As per the objective of my study, it revealed that there is no significant difference in the perception between administrative nurses and clinical side nurses in all IPNG subscale, It can be due to the difference in the number of participants, as 13% of administrative nurses only participated in a survey whereas 87% were clinical nurses. Comparing the clinical specialty with subscales showed a significant difference in participation, goals, and practice where P value is < 0.05, and also related to education. But no significant difference noticed among age or gender. Conclusion: This study seeks to understand the relationship between different perceptions and views related to shared governance.","PeriodicalId":333762,"journal":{"name":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Registered Nurses Perception of Shared Governance with Index Professional Nursing Governance Tool Perception of Shared Governance\",\"authors\":\"S. Sajan\",\"doi\":\"10.21522/TIJNR.2015.05.02.ART008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study explores how registered nurses perceive shared governance and how they implement in their workplace, especially on how they lead or how they are being led. The analyses of survey data provide us with valuable information specific to nurse's perceptions in a different work environment. It might forecast aid in innovative decision-making processes. Method: A descriptive survey with Hess Index of professional nursing governance was used in the study. All RNs working on the clinical side and in the administrative area are selected to participate in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Data analysis in the study revealed RN s perception towards the type of governance was determined by the mean score and find out that shared governance is practiced as per the guidelines set up by the IPNG Tool. As per the objective of my study, it revealed that there is no significant difference in the perception between administrative nurses and clinical side nurses in all IPNG subscale, It can be due to the difference in the number of participants, as 13% of administrative nurses only participated in a survey whereas 87% were clinical nurses. Comparing the clinical specialty with subscales showed a significant difference in participation, goals, and practice where P value is < 0.05, and also related to education. But no significant difference noticed among age or gender. Conclusion: This study seeks to understand the relationship between different perceptions and views related to shared governance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":333762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJNR.2015.05.02.ART008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJNR.2015.05.02.ART008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究探讨了注册护士如何看待共享治理以及他们如何在工作场所实施,特别是他们如何领导或他们如何被领导。调查数据的分析为我们提供了有价值的信息,具体到护士在不同的工作环境的看法。它可能在创新决策过程中提供预测援助。方法:采用Hess专业护理治理指数进行描述性调查。所有在临床和行政领域工作的注册护士都被选中参加这项研究。数据分析采用SPSS version 20。结果:研究中的数据分析表明,注册会计师对治理类型的感知是由平均得分决定的,并发现共享治理是按照IPNG工具设置的指导方针进行的。根据我的研究目的,它揭示了行政护士和临床侧护士在所有IPNG子量表上的感知没有显著差异,这可能是由于参与人数的差异,13%的行政护士只参加了一项调查,而87%的临床护士参加了一项调查。临床专科与子量表比较,在参与、目标、实践方面存在显著差异,P值< 0.05,且与学历相关。但在年龄和性别之间没有明显差异。结论:本研究旨在了解与共享治理相关的不同观念和观点之间的关系。
Registered Nurses Perception of Shared Governance with Index Professional Nursing Governance Tool Perception of Shared Governance
The present study explores how registered nurses perceive shared governance and how they implement in their workplace, especially on how they lead or how they are being led. The analyses of survey data provide us with valuable information specific to nurse's perceptions in a different work environment. It might forecast aid in innovative decision-making processes. Method: A descriptive survey with Hess Index of professional nursing governance was used in the study. All RNs working on the clinical side and in the administrative area are selected to participate in the study. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 20. Results: Data analysis in the study revealed RN s perception towards the type of governance was determined by the mean score and find out that shared governance is practiced as per the guidelines set up by the IPNG Tool. As per the objective of my study, it revealed that there is no significant difference in the perception between administrative nurses and clinical side nurses in all IPNG subscale, It can be due to the difference in the number of participants, as 13% of administrative nurses only participated in a survey whereas 87% were clinical nurses. Comparing the clinical specialty with subscales showed a significant difference in participation, goals, and practice where P value is < 0.05, and also related to education. But no significant difference noticed among age or gender. Conclusion: This study seeks to understand the relationship between different perceptions and views related to shared governance.