{"title":"通过文本差异表示来理解UML类模型的变化","authors":"H. Störrle","doi":"10.1145/2523599.2523601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding the difference between two models, such as different versions of a design, can be difficult. It is a commonly held belief that the best way of presenting a model difference is by using graph or tree-based visualizations. We disagree and present an alternative approach where sets of low-level model differences are abstracted into high-level model differences that lend themselves to being presented textually. The results of preliminary user studies support our claim.","PeriodicalId":200965,"journal":{"name":"ME '12","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making sense of UML class model changes by textual difference presentation\",\"authors\":\"H. Störrle\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2523599.2523601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Understanding the difference between two models, such as different versions of a design, can be difficult. It is a commonly held belief that the best way of presenting a model difference is by using graph or tree-based visualizations. We disagree and present an alternative approach where sets of low-level model differences are abstracted into high-level model differences that lend themselves to being presented textually. The results of preliminary user studies support our claim.\",\"PeriodicalId\":200965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ME '12\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ME '12\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2523599.2523601\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ME '12","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2523599.2523601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Making sense of UML class model changes by textual difference presentation
Understanding the difference between two models, such as different versions of a design, can be difficult. It is a commonly held belief that the best way of presenting a model difference is by using graph or tree-based visualizations. We disagree and present an alternative approach where sets of low-level model differences are abstracted into high-level model differences that lend themselves to being presented textually. The results of preliminary user studies support our claim.