吃掉你自己的DevOps:一种模型驱动的方法来证明持续集成管道的合理性

Corinne Pulgar
{"title":"吃掉你自己的DevOps:一种模型驱动的方法来证明持续集成管道的合理性","authors":"Corinne Pulgar","doi":"10.1145/3550356.3552395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many aspiring DevOps projects have introduced continuous development or continuous integration pipelines to their workflow as proof of their trustworthiness. However, a quality control protocol for pipelines has yet to be researched. This contribution suggests a model-driven approach using justification diagrams as a means to evaluate a pipeline's coherency with its project. The approach is partly automated and tested on three open-source projects with promising results.","PeriodicalId":182662,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eat your own DevOps: a model driven approach to justify continuous integration pipelines\",\"authors\":\"Corinne Pulgar\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3550356.3552395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many aspiring DevOps projects have introduced continuous development or continuous integration pipelines to their workflow as proof of their trustworthiness. However, a quality control protocol for pipelines has yet to be researched. This contribution suggests a model-driven approach using justification diagrams as a means to evaluate a pipeline's coherency with its project. The approach is partly automated and tested on three open-source projects with promising results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":182662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3552395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems: Companion Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3550356.3552395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多有抱负的DevOps项目已经在他们的工作流程中引入了持续开发或持续集成管道,以证明他们的可靠性。然而,管道的质量控制方案还有待研究。这篇文章建议采用模型驱动的方法,使用论证图作为评估管道与其项目的一致性的方法。该方法是部分自动化的,并在三个开源项目上进行了测试,结果很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eat your own DevOps: a model driven approach to justify continuous integration pipelines
Many aspiring DevOps projects have introduced continuous development or continuous integration pipelines to their workflow as proof of their trustworthiness. However, a quality control protocol for pipelines has yet to be researched. This contribution suggests a model-driven approach using justification diagrams as a means to evaluate a pipeline's coherency with its project. The approach is partly automated and tested on three open-source projects with promising results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信