不寻常时期的当代非洲历史

N. Roos, Tinashe Nyamunda, Suraj Yengde, J. Kufandirori
{"title":"不寻常时期的当代非洲历史","authors":"N. Roos, Tinashe Nyamunda, Suraj Yengde, J. Kufandirori","doi":"10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Initially, we envisaged that this editorial essay would focus on history-writing in the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. In particular, we hoped to examine how that self-proclaimed moment of technological evangelism raises questions about the future of society and whether, paradoxically, the study of the past might provide a beacon, a pilot light, to navigate these unknown places. Tapping into the 1923 debates between biochemist John Burdon Sanderson Haldane and philosopher Bertrand Russell about technology and moral progress, we wanted to ask what work needs to be done to develop a novel ethic to match our technological ingenuity – and the role of history, the history of Africa, in developing this.1 This undertaking seemed particularly germane, given how history and other critical disciplines were by-passed and disregarded by boosters of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the progressive New World that some believed it heralded. Since the time that we began sketching the outlines for that editorial, coronavirus has arrived. Much of the world is in some form of lockdown. Professional scholars everywhere are under stress as they adjust to new work arrangements, expectations of “customer service” from many students, (inevitably) reduced budgets, and existential challenges about the labour which they undertake. For historians, these might include asking whether history-writing is an appropriate activity in times like these, unprecedented in","PeriodicalId":409914,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Contemporary History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contemporary African history in unusual times\",\"authors\":\"N. Roos, Tinashe Nyamunda, Suraj Yengde, J. Kufandirori\",\"doi\":\"10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Initially, we envisaged that this editorial essay would focus on history-writing in the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. In particular, we hoped to examine how that self-proclaimed moment of technological evangelism raises questions about the future of society and whether, paradoxically, the study of the past might provide a beacon, a pilot light, to navigate these unknown places. Tapping into the 1923 debates between biochemist John Burdon Sanderson Haldane and philosopher Bertrand Russell about technology and moral progress, we wanted to ask what work needs to be done to develop a novel ethic to match our technological ingenuity – and the role of history, the history of Africa, in developing this.1 This undertaking seemed particularly germane, given how history and other critical disciplines were by-passed and disregarded by boosters of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the progressive New World that some believed it heralded. Since the time that we began sketching the outlines for that editorial, coronavirus has arrived. Much of the world is in some form of lockdown. Professional scholars everywhere are under stress as they adjust to new work arrangements, expectations of “customer service” from many students, (inevitably) reduced budgets, and existential challenges about the labour which they undertake. For historians, these might include asking whether history-writing is an appropriate activity in times like these, unprecedented in\",\"PeriodicalId\":409914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Contemporary History\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Contemporary History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Contemporary History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18820/24150509/sjch45.v1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最初,我们设想这篇社论将侧重于所谓的第四次工业革命中的历史写作。特别是,我们希望研究这个自称为技术布道的时刻是如何提出有关社会未来的问题的,以及对过去的研究是否可能提供一盏灯塔,一盏引航灯,以导航这些未知的地方。参考1923年生物化学家约翰·伯登·桑德森·霍尔丹和哲学家伯特兰·罗素之间关于技术和道德进步的辩论,我们想问,要发展一种与我们的技术创造力相匹配的新伦理,需要做些什么工作,以及历史,非洲的历史,在发展这一点上的作用考虑到第四次工业革命和一些人认为它预示着进步的新世界的支持者是如何绕过和忽视历史和其他关键学科的,这项工作似乎尤为重要。自从我们开始为那篇社论勾勒轮廓以来,冠状病毒已经到来。世界上大部分地区都处于某种形式的封锁状态。世界各地的专业学者都承受着压力,因为他们要适应新的工作安排、许多学生对“客户服务”的期望、(不可避免的)预算削减,以及他们所从事的工作面临的生存挑战。对于历史学家来说,这些问题可能包括在这样一个史无前例的时代,写历史是否合适
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contemporary African history in unusual times
Initially, we envisaged that this editorial essay would focus on history-writing in the so-called Fourth Industrial Revolution. In particular, we hoped to examine how that self-proclaimed moment of technological evangelism raises questions about the future of society and whether, paradoxically, the study of the past might provide a beacon, a pilot light, to navigate these unknown places. Tapping into the 1923 debates between biochemist John Burdon Sanderson Haldane and philosopher Bertrand Russell about technology and moral progress, we wanted to ask what work needs to be done to develop a novel ethic to match our technological ingenuity – and the role of history, the history of Africa, in developing this.1 This undertaking seemed particularly germane, given how history and other critical disciplines were by-passed and disregarded by boosters of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the progressive New World that some believed it heralded. Since the time that we began sketching the outlines for that editorial, coronavirus has arrived. Much of the world is in some form of lockdown. Professional scholars everywhere are under stress as they adjust to new work arrangements, expectations of “customer service” from many students, (inevitably) reduced budgets, and existential challenges about the labour which they undertake. For historians, these might include asking whether history-writing is an appropriate activity in times like these, unprecedented in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信