s暗示vs r暗示:在近似推理中哪个更好?

Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Pub Date : 1995-03-17 DOI:10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527725

E. Eslami, J. J. Buckley

{"title":"s暗示vs r暗示:在近似推理中哪个更好?","authors":"E. Eslami, J. J. Buckley","doi":"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present basic criteria that we believe should be satisfied by any implication operator in approximate reasoning. We then argue that S-implications satisfy all the criteria whereas R-implications fail one of the criteria. We conclude that S-implications are more applicable than R-implications in approximate reasoning.","PeriodicalId":298915,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"S-implications vs R-implications: which is better in approximate reasoning?\",\"authors\":\"E. Eslami, J. J. Buckley\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527725\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present basic criteria that we believe should be satisfied by any implication operator in approximate reasoning. We then argue that S-implications satisfy all the criteria whereas R-implications fail one of the criteria. We conclude that S-implications are more applicable than R-implications in approximate reasoning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527725\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

我们提出了近似推理中任何蕴涵算子都应满足的基本准则。然后我们论证s暗示满足所有标准，而r暗示不符合其中一个标准。我们得出结论，s暗示比r暗示更适用于近似推理。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

S-implications vs R-implications: which is better in approximate reasoning?

We present basic criteria that we believe should be satisfied by any implication operator in approximate reasoning. We then argue that S-implications satisfy all the criteria whereas R-implications fail one of the criteria. We conclude that S-implications are more applicable than R-implications in approximate reasoning.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of 3rd International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and Annual Conference of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society

自引率

0.00%

发文量