评价:高尚的职业,行人的实践

M. Scriven
{"title":"评价:高尚的职业,行人的实践","authors":"M. Scriven","doi":"10.2307/1179197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Its basic conception excludes crucial paradigms of evaluation: for example, the evaluation by historians of Napoleon's tactics at Waterloo. I take a noneducational case, for interest, but there can of course be educational ones too; suppose you are evaluating the school system in Athens. It seems clear that this is logically the same kind of enterprise as evaluating the tactics of a field general or contemporary educational activities. But the latter can easily and the former cannot usually be subsumed under the PDK (ex-CIPP) definition, which requires that evaluation be \"data gathering for future decision making.\"","PeriodicalId":273582,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Theory Network","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation: Noble Profession and Pedestrian Practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Scriven\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1179197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Its basic conception excludes crucial paradigms of evaluation: for example, the evaluation by historians of Napoleon's tactics at Waterloo. I take a noneducational case, for interest, but there can of course be educational ones too; suppose you are evaluating the school system in Athens. It seems clear that this is logically the same kind of enterprise as evaluating the tactics of a field general or contemporary educational activities. But the latter can easily and the former cannot usually be subsumed under the PDK (ex-CIPP) definition, which requires that evaluation be \\\"data gathering for future decision making.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":273582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Theory Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Theory Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1179197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

它的基本概念排除了评价的关键范式:例如,历史学家对拿破仑在滑铁卢的战术的评价。出于兴趣,我举一个非教育的例子,但当然也可以有教育的例子;假设你在评估雅典的学校系统。很明显,从逻辑上讲,这与评价野战将军或当代教育活动的战术是同一类事业。但是,后者可以很容易地归入PDK(前cipp)定义,而前者通常不能归入PDK(前cipp)定义,后者要求评估是“为未来决策收集数据”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation: Noble Profession and Pedestrian Practice
Its basic conception excludes crucial paradigms of evaluation: for example, the evaluation by historians of Napoleon's tactics at Waterloo. I take a noneducational case, for interest, but there can of course be educational ones too; suppose you are evaluating the school system in Athens. It seems clear that this is logically the same kind of enterprise as evaluating the tactics of a field general or contemporary educational activities. But the latter can easily and the former cannot usually be subsumed under the PDK (ex-CIPP) definition, which requires that evaluation be "data gathering for future decision making."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信