哮喘护理途径

C. Rolland, M. Sapéne
{"title":"哮喘护理途径","authors":"C. Rolland, M. Sapéne","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Asthme & Allergies Helpline regularly receives asthma patients’ testimonies describing problems in their care pathway. Asthme & Allergies decided to carry out a survey to verify the information and to collect patients quotes. Method: A 10 question questionnaire self-administered via Survey Monkey was proposed to patients on Asthme & Allergies website between 29/05 & 7/07/2017 Results: 246 answers were collected. 79.7% of respondents are women. 32.9% are under 30, 45.9% between 31 and 50, and 21.2% over 50 years old. 65% report a follow-up by a GP, 34% by a pulmonologist in private practice, 29% by a hospital pulmonologist, 26% by an allergist. The frequency of visits is every 3 months for 32.5%, twice a year for 25.6%, once a year for 21.1%, every month for 10.1%. 79.3% got lung function tests and 78.9% allergy tests. 49.6% received an emergency action plan. 44.9% were hospitalized for their asthma, and only 51% of them left hospital with an appointment with a pulmonologist. Medical follow-up for asthma is considered as non-existent for 9.7%, insufficient for 29.54%, correct for 32.07%, satisfactory for 18.57%, very satisfactory for 10.13% Conclusion: The quotes show that respondents are mainly people with severe asthma, which explains the high rate of lung function & allergy tests and hospitalizations. Patients express their difficulty in getting a diagnosis, they specify that the appointment with a pulmonologist was often taken at their own initiative, and the delays for an appointment are too long. They also say that asthma is not taken seriously enough. This survey drew our attention on the need to develop adapted tools to optimize diagnosis, patient pathway and access to specialists.","PeriodicalId":228043,"journal":{"name":"Medical education, web and internet","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asthma care pathway\",\"authors\":\"C. Rolland, M. Sapéne\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Asthme & Allergies Helpline regularly receives asthma patients’ testimonies describing problems in their care pathway. Asthme & Allergies decided to carry out a survey to verify the information and to collect patients quotes. Method: A 10 question questionnaire self-administered via Survey Monkey was proposed to patients on Asthme & Allergies website between 29/05 & 7/07/2017 Results: 246 answers were collected. 79.7% of respondents are women. 32.9% are under 30, 45.9% between 31 and 50, and 21.2% over 50 years old. 65% report a follow-up by a GP, 34% by a pulmonologist in private practice, 29% by a hospital pulmonologist, 26% by an allergist. The frequency of visits is every 3 months for 32.5%, twice a year for 25.6%, once a year for 21.1%, every month for 10.1%. 79.3% got lung function tests and 78.9% allergy tests. 49.6% received an emergency action plan. 44.9% were hospitalized for their asthma, and only 51% of them left hospital with an appointment with a pulmonologist. Medical follow-up for asthma is considered as non-existent for 9.7%, insufficient for 29.54%, correct for 32.07%, satisfactory for 18.57%, very satisfactory for 10.13% Conclusion: The quotes show that respondents are mainly people with severe asthma, which explains the high rate of lung function & allergy tests and hospitalizations. Patients express their difficulty in getting a diagnosis, they specify that the appointment with a pulmonologist was often taken at their own initiative, and the delays for an appointment are too long. They also say that asthma is not taken seriously enough. This survey drew our attention on the need to develop adapted tools to optimize diagnosis, patient pathway and access to specialists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":228043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical education, web and internet\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education, web and internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:哮喘和过敏热线定期收到哮喘患者的证词,描述他们的护理途径的问题。Asthme & allergy决定进行一项调查,以核实信息并收集患者的报价。方法:于2017年5月29日至7月7日期间,通过Survey Monkey对哮喘与过敏网站的患者进行问卷调查,问卷共10个问题。79.7%的受访者是女性。30岁以下占32.9%,31 - 50岁占45.9%,50岁以上占21.2%。65%的人报告由全科医生随访,34%由私人执业的肺科医生随访,29%由医院肺科医生随访,26%由过敏症专科医生随访。就诊频率为每3个月一次(32.5%),一年两次(25.6%),一年一次(21.1%),每月一次(10.1%)。79.3%做了肺功能检查,78.9%做了过敏检查。49.6%收到了紧急行动计划。44.9%的人因哮喘住院,其中只有51%的人在出院时预约了肺科医生。9.7%的人认为不存在哮喘医学随访,29.54%的人认为不充分,32.07%的人认为正确,18.57%的人认为满意,10.13%的人认为非常满意。结论:从引文中可以看出,被调查者主要是重度哮喘患者,这也解释了肺功能和过敏检查和住院率高的原因。患者表达了获得诊断的困难,他们指出,与肺病专家的预约通常是他们自己主动提出的,而且预约延误的时间太长。他们还说,哮喘没有得到足够的重视。这项调查引起了我们的注意,需要开发适应的工具来优化诊断,患者路径和获得专家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Asthma care pathway
Introduction: Asthme & Allergies Helpline regularly receives asthma patients’ testimonies describing problems in their care pathway. Asthme & Allergies decided to carry out a survey to verify the information and to collect patients quotes. Method: A 10 question questionnaire self-administered via Survey Monkey was proposed to patients on Asthme & Allergies website between 29/05 & 7/07/2017 Results: 246 answers were collected. 79.7% of respondents are women. 32.9% are under 30, 45.9% between 31 and 50, and 21.2% over 50 years old. 65% report a follow-up by a GP, 34% by a pulmonologist in private practice, 29% by a hospital pulmonologist, 26% by an allergist. The frequency of visits is every 3 months for 32.5%, twice a year for 25.6%, once a year for 21.1%, every month for 10.1%. 79.3% got lung function tests and 78.9% allergy tests. 49.6% received an emergency action plan. 44.9% were hospitalized for their asthma, and only 51% of them left hospital with an appointment with a pulmonologist. Medical follow-up for asthma is considered as non-existent for 9.7%, insufficient for 29.54%, correct for 32.07%, satisfactory for 18.57%, very satisfactory for 10.13% Conclusion: The quotes show that respondents are mainly people with severe asthma, which explains the high rate of lung function & allergy tests and hospitalizations. Patients express their difficulty in getting a diagnosis, they specify that the appointment with a pulmonologist was often taken at their own initiative, and the delays for an appointment are too long. They also say that asthma is not taken seriously enough. This survey drew our attention on the need to develop adapted tools to optimize diagnosis, patient pathway and access to specialists.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信