探讨利用阴极经颅直流电刺激减轻vr - hmd致晕动病的可行性

Gang Li, Francisco Macía Varela, Abdullah Habib, Qi Zhang, Mark Mcgill, S. Brewster, F. Pollick
{"title":"探讨利用阴极经颅直流电刺激减轻vr - hmd致晕动病的可行性","authors":"Gang Li, Francisco Macía Varela, Abdullah Habib, Qi Zhang, Mark Mcgill, S. Brewster, F. Pollick","doi":"10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many head-mounted virtual reality display (VR-HMD) applications that involve moving visual environments (e.g., virtual rollercoaster, car and airplane driving) will trigger cybersickness (CS). Previous research Arshad et al. (2015) has explored the inhibitory effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vestibular cortical excitability, applied to traditional motion sickness (MS), however its applicability to CS, as typically experienced in immersive VR, remains unknown. The presented double-blinded 2x2x3 mixed design experiment (independent variables: stimulation condition [cathodal/anodal]; timing of VR stimulus exposure [before/after tDCS]; sickness scenario [slight symptoms onset/moderate symptoms onset/recovery]) aims to investigate whether the tDCS protocol adapted from Arshad et al. (2015) is effective at delaying the onset of CS symptoms and/or accelerating recovery from them in healthy participants. Quantitative analysis revealed that the cathodal tDCS indeed delayed the onset of slight symptoms if compared to that in anodal condition. However, there are no significant differences in delaying the onset of moderate symptoms nor shortening time to recovery between the two stimulation types. Possible reasons for present findings are discussed and suggestions for future studies are proposed.","PeriodicalId":348199,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the feasibility of mitigating VR-HMD-induced cybersickness using cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation\",\"authors\":\"Gang Li, Francisco Macía Varela, Abdullah Habib, Qi Zhang, Mark Mcgill, S. Brewster, F. Pollick\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many head-mounted virtual reality display (VR-HMD) applications that involve moving visual environments (e.g., virtual rollercoaster, car and airplane driving) will trigger cybersickness (CS). Previous research Arshad et al. (2015) has explored the inhibitory effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vestibular cortical excitability, applied to traditional motion sickness (MS), however its applicability to CS, as typically experienced in immersive VR, remains unknown. The presented double-blinded 2x2x3 mixed design experiment (independent variables: stimulation condition [cathodal/anodal]; timing of VR stimulus exposure [before/after tDCS]; sickness scenario [slight symptoms onset/moderate symptoms onset/recovery]) aims to investigate whether the tDCS protocol adapted from Arshad et al. (2015) is effective at delaying the onset of CS symptoms and/or accelerating recovery from them in healthy participants. Quantitative analysis revealed that the cathodal tDCS indeed delayed the onset of slight symptoms if compared to that in anodal condition. However, there are no significant differences in delaying the onset of moderate symptoms nor shortening time to recovery between the two stimulation types. Possible reasons for present findings are discussed and suggestions for future studies are proposed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR50618.2020.00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多头戴式虚拟现实显示器(VR-HMD)应用涉及移动的视觉环境(例如,虚拟过山车、汽车和飞机驾驶),会引发晕动症(CS)。先前的研究Arshad等人(2015)探索了阴极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对前庭皮层兴奋性的抑制作用,并将其应用于传统的晕动病(MS),但其对CS的适用性,如沉浸式VR的典型体验,尚不清楚。采用双盲2x2x3混合设计实验(自变量:刺激条件[阴极/阳极];VR刺激暴露时间[tDCS前/后];疾病情景[轻微症状发作/中度症状发作/恢复])旨在调查Arshad等人(2015)改编的tDCS方案是否能有效延缓健康参与者CS症状的发作和/或加速其恢复。定量分析显示,与阳极状态相比,阴极tDCS确实延迟了轻微症状的发作。然而,两种刺激类型在延迟中度症状发作和缩短恢复时间方面没有显著差异。讨论了目前研究结果的可能原因,并对未来的研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the feasibility of mitigating VR-HMD-induced cybersickness using cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation
Many head-mounted virtual reality display (VR-HMD) applications that involve moving visual environments (e.g., virtual rollercoaster, car and airplane driving) will trigger cybersickness (CS). Previous research Arshad et al. (2015) has explored the inhibitory effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on vestibular cortical excitability, applied to traditional motion sickness (MS), however its applicability to CS, as typically experienced in immersive VR, remains unknown. The presented double-blinded 2x2x3 mixed design experiment (independent variables: stimulation condition [cathodal/anodal]; timing of VR stimulus exposure [before/after tDCS]; sickness scenario [slight symptoms onset/moderate symptoms onset/recovery]) aims to investigate whether the tDCS protocol adapted from Arshad et al. (2015) is effective at delaying the onset of CS symptoms and/or accelerating recovery from them in healthy participants. Quantitative analysis revealed that the cathodal tDCS indeed delayed the onset of slight symptoms if compared to that in anodal condition. However, there are no significant differences in delaying the onset of moderate symptoms nor shortening time to recovery between the two stimulation types. Possible reasons for present findings are discussed and suggestions for future studies are proposed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信