{"title":"大巴黎的投机空间:在克利希-苏-布瓦和孟费","authors":"Gillian Jein","doi":"10.5117/9789463722032_CH11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter engages with the spatial politics of aesthetics in the Parisian\n suburbs of Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil. It examines how JR’s street\n art brings into view the lines of tension informing neighbourhood change.\n Firstly, the chapter explores how urban aesthetics have become important to\n gentrification analysis and looks at the commodification of socially engaged\n aesthetic practices via the “creative cities” ethos. In the subsequent sections,\n the chapter introduces a relational reading of JR’s artistic practice in “Clichy-\n Montfermeil.” The central questions guiding the enquiries are as follows: What\n can street art tell us about the antagonisms shaping processes of speculation\n in these towns? What can its aesthetic presence reveal about shifts in spatial\n imaginaries that are disarticulating the banlieues as “deviant,” “no-go zone” to\n rearticulate them “as a hunting ground for seasoned investors” (Clerima 2019)?","PeriodicalId":199048,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetics of Gentrification","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Speculative Spaces in Grand Paris : Reading JR in Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Jein\",\"doi\":\"10.5117/9789463722032_CH11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter engages with the spatial politics of aesthetics in the Parisian\\n suburbs of Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil. It examines how JR’s street\\n art brings into view the lines of tension informing neighbourhood change.\\n Firstly, the chapter explores how urban aesthetics have become important to\\n gentrification analysis and looks at the commodification of socially engaged\\n aesthetic practices via the “creative cities” ethos. In the subsequent sections,\\n the chapter introduces a relational reading of JR’s artistic practice in “Clichy-\\n Montfermeil.” The central questions guiding the enquiries are as follows: What\\n can street art tell us about the antagonisms shaping processes of speculation\\n in these towns? What can its aesthetic presence reveal about shifts in spatial\\n imaginaries that are disarticulating the banlieues as “deviant,” “no-go zone” to\\n rearticulate them “as a hunting ground for seasoned investors” (Clerima 2019)?\",\"PeriodicalId\":199048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetics of Gentrification\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetics of Gentrification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722032_CH11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetics of Gentrification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5117/9789463722032_CH11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Speculative Spaces in Grand Paris : Reading JR in Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil
This chapter engages with the spatial politics of aesthetics in the Parisian
suburbs of Clichy-sous-Bois and Montfermeil. It examines how JR’s street
art brings into view the lines of tension informing neighbourhood change.
Firstly, the chapter explores how urban aesthetics have become important to
gentrification analysis and looks at the commodification of socially engaged
aesthetic practices via the “creative cities” ethos. In the subsequent sections,
the chapter introduces a relational reading of JR’s artistic practice in “Clichy-
Montfermeil.” The central questions guiding the enquiries are as follows: What
can street art tell us about the antagonisms shaping processes of speculation
in these towns? What can its aesthetic presence reveal about shifts in spatial
imaginaries that are disarticulating the banlieues as “deviant,” “no-go zone” to
rearticulate them “as a hunting ground for seasoned investors” (Clerima 2019)?