从医护人员和患者的角度看动物辅助治疗

Ana Flávia Carneiro Salgado, Daniela Gonçalves de Melo, Juliana Cristina Meireles Nogueira, Karolyne Vale de Sá, Mariama Oliveira Scarton, Jonas Moraes Filho
{"title":"从医护人员和患者的角度看动物辅助治疗","authors":"Ana Flávia Carneiro Salgado, Daniela Gonçalves de Melo, Juliana Cristina Meireles Nogueira, Karolyne Vale de Sá, Mariama Oliveira Scarton, Jonas Moraes Filho","doi":"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;7;6-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: This work aims to obtain information on the opinion of health professionals and patients regarding the effects of animal assisted therapy/activity (AAT). METHODS: An opinion poll was conducted with the medical team (consisting of: doctors, nurses, psychologists) and patients (male and female gender over 18 years of age) on the use of animal assisted therapy through application through application of the questionnaire by the Google Forms platform, being applied only once; participants were selected for convenience. RESULTS: According to the groups surveyed 65.62% of participants reported already knowing AAT, being better known in the group of health professionals, among these 6.71% have already participated in some intervention of the type. In terms of risk/benefit to AAT, it gives more benefits than risk according to 75.03% of participants. Regarding species considered viable for the application of this therapy, 92.63%of participants believe that the dog would be the most appropriate animal, followed by the cat (66.84%) and the horse (55.66%). According to health professionals, children (90.5%), followed by elderly (87.1%) and autistic (73.6%) are the groups that benefited the most from AAT. CONCLUSION: Through this study it was possible to see that in the general population, men and women, the knowledge of animal assisted therapy is still little widespread when compared to health professionals. In addition, studies focused on proof of physiological benefits to the patient are still incipient and have limitations on the number of participants and methodology.","PeriodicalId":285800,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE MEDICAL STAFF AND PATIENTS\",\"authors\":\"Ana Flávia Carneiro Salgado, Daniela Gonçalves de Melo, Juliana Cristina Meireles Nogueira, Karolyne Vale de Sá, Mariama Oliveira Scarton, Jonas Moraes Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;7;6-11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: This work aims to obtain information on the opinion of health professionals and patients regarding the effects of animal assisted therapy/activity (AAT). METHODS: An opinion poll was conducted with the medical team (consisting of: doctors, nurses, psychologists) and patients (male and female gender over 18 years of age) on the use of animal assisted therapy through application through application of the questionnaire by the Google Forms platform, being applied only once; participants were selected for convenience. RESULTS: According to the groups surveyed 65.62% of participants reported already knowing AAT, being better known in the group of health professionals, among these 6.71% have already participated in some intervention of the type. In terms of risk/benefit to AAT, it gives more benefits than risk according to 75.03% of participants. Regarding species considered viable for the application of this therapy, 92.63%of participants believe that the dog would be the most appropriate animal, followed by the cat (66.84%) and the horse (55.66%). According to health professionals, children (90.5%), followed by elderly (87.1%) and autistic (73.6%) are the groups that benefited the most from AAT. CONCLUSION: Through this study it was possible to see that in the general population, men and women, the knowledge of animal assisted therapy is still little widespread when compared to health professionals. In addition, studies focused on proof of physiological benefits to the patient are still incipient and have limitations on the number of participants and methodology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;7;6-11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56242/globalhealth;2022;2;7;6-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解卫生专业人员和患者对动物辅助治疗/活动(AAT)效果的看法。方法:通过Google Forms平台应用问卷,对医疗团队(包括:医生、护士、心理医生)和患者(18岁以上男女)进行应用动物辅助治疗的意见调查,仅应用一次;选择参与者是为了方便。结果:被调查人群中65.62%的被调查者表示已经了解AAT,其中卫生专业人员对AAT的了解程度较高,其中6.71%的人已经参加过某种类型的干预。在AAT的风险/收益方面,75.03%的参与者认为它带来的收益大于风险。对于适用该疗法的物种,92.63%的参与者认为狗是最合适的动物,其次是猫(66.84%)和马(55.66%)。根据卫生专业人员的说法,儿童(90.5%),其次是老年人(87.1%)和自闭症患者(73.6%)是从AAT中受益最多的群体。结论:通过这项研究可以看到,与卫生专业人员相比,在普通人群中,无论男性还是女性,动物辅助疗法的知识仍然很少普及。此外,专注于证明对患者生理益处的研究仍处于起步阶段,并且在参与者数量和方法上存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANIMAL ASSISTED THERAPY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF THE MEDICAL STAFF AND PATIENTS
OBJECTIVE: This work aims to obtain information on the opinion of health professionals and patients regarding the effects of animal assisted therapy/activity (AAT). METHODS: An opinion poll was conducted with the medical team (consisting of: doctors, nurses, psychologists) and patients (male and female gender over 18 years of age) on the use of animal assisted therapy through application through application of the questionnaire by the Google Forms platform, being applied only once; participants were selected for convenience. RESULTS: According to the groups surveyed 65.62% of participants reported already knowing AAT, being better known in the group of health professionals, among these 6.71% have already participated in some intervention of the type. In terms of risk/benefit to AAT, it gives more benefits than risk according to 75.03% of participants. Regarding species considered viable for the application of this therapy, 92.63%of participants believe that the dog would be the most appropriate animal, followed by the cat (66.84%) and the horse (55.66%). According to health professionals, children (90.5%), followed by elderly (87.1%) and autistic (73.6%) are the groups that benefited the most from AAT. CONCLUSION: Through this study it was possible to see that in the general population, men and women, the knowledge of animal assisted therapy is still little widespread when compared to health professionals. In addition, studies focused on proof of physiological benefits to the patient are still incipient and have limitations on the number of participants and methodology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信