宗教与战争——一笔勾销的回归

Milan Subotić
{"title":"宗教与战争——一笔勾销的回归","authors":"Milan Subotić","doi":"10.2298/medjp1904476s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Famous German sociologist and philosopher, Jurgen Habermas, often points out\n that we not only live in postmodern but in ?post-secular society? as well.\n This post-secular society appears as a significant opposite to the society\n which we heard about several decades ago, and which was mostly secular or\n striving towards secularity. Almost all of the 20th century, and especially\n decades after World War II, was marked with stands that religion and the\n Holy are losing its significance in contemporary society. However, at the\n end of the 20th and especially at the beginning of the turbulent 21st\n century, we are witnessing the fact that religion is not defeated. More\n precisely, it did not lose its place both in private and public life. It is\n obvious that religion was ?under the radar? for different anticipators from\n the 20th century, which proved that it is still a complex social phenomenon\n that cannot be easily explained nor predicted. How did religion come back\n from ?nonsense? to the main stage of important contemporary social\n phenomena? What are the potentials of religion in causing, and what in the\n pacification of conflicts? What are the characteristics of religion-inspired\n conflicts, then and now? How contemporary monotheisms see the (just) war?\n These are some of the questions we tried to answer in this paper through the\n review of contemporary literature and content analysis. The author\n simultaneously analysed if numbers about the increase of believers in the\n world (absolute) and numbers in the percentage of faithful ones (relative)\n are valid indicators that religion returned in the context of former\n importance. Based on trends existing in this field during the last forty\n years, as well as on historical heritage left behind by contemporary\n monotheisms, the paper also presents a framework for a prognosis about the\n future of religion in the context of the upcoming conflicts.","PeriodicalId":316095,"journal":{"name":"Medjunarodni problemi","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religion and war - the return of the written-off\",\"authors\":\"Milan Subotić\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/medjp1904476s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Famous German sociologist and philosopher, Jurgen Habermas, often points out\\n that we not only live in postmodern but in ?post-secular society? as well.\\n This post-secular society appears as a significant opposite to the society\\n which we heard about several decades ago, and which was mostly secular or\\n striving towards secularity. Almost all of the 20th century, and especially\\n decades after World War II, was marked with stands that religion and the\\n Holy are losing its significance in contemporary society. However, at the\\n end of the 20th and especially at the beginning of the turbulent 21st\\n century, we are witnessing the fact that religion is not defeated. More\\n precisely, it did not lose its place both in private and public life. It is\\n obvious that religion was ?under the radar? for different anticipators from\\n the 20th century, which proved that it is still a complex social phenomenon\\n that cannot be easily explained nor predicted. How did religion come back\\n from ?nonsense? to the main stage of important contemporary social\\n phenomena? What are the potentials of religion in causing, and what in the\\n pacification of conflicts? What are the characteristics of religion-inspired\\n conflicts, then and now? How contemporary monotheisms see the (just) war?\\n These are some of the questions we tried to answer in this paper through the\\n review of contemporary literature and content analysis. The author\\n simultaneously analysed if numbers about the increase of believers in the\\n world (absolute) and numbers in the percentage of faithful ones (relative)\\n are valid indicators that religion returned in the context of former\\n importance. Based on trends existing in this field during the last forty\\n years, as well as on historical heritage left behind by contemporary\\n monotheisms, the paper also presents a framework for a prognosis about the\\n future of religion in the context of the upcoming conflicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":316095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medjunarodni problemi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1904476s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medjunarodni problemi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/medjp1904476s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

德国著名社会学家、哲学家尤尔根·哈贝马斯经常指出,我们不仅生活在后现代社会,而且生活在“后世俗社会”。也这种后世俗社会与我们几十年前所听到的社会截然相反,当时的社会大多是世俗的,或者正在努力走向世俗。几乎整个20世纪,特别是第二次世界大战后的几十年,宗教和圣地在当代社会中失去了其重要性。然而,在20世纪末,特别是在动荡的21世纪初,我们正在见证一个事实,即宗教并没有被击败。更确切地说,它并没有失去在私人和公共生活中的地位。很明显,宗教是不受关注的。对于20世纪不同的预测者来说,这证明了它仍然是一个复杂的社会现象,不容易解释和预测。宗教是怎么回来的?胡说八道?到当代重要社会现象的主要阶段?宗教在引发冲突和平息冲突方面的潜力是什么?在过去和现在,宗教引发的冲突有什么特点?当代一神论者如何看待这场(正义的)战争?这些都是本文试图通过对当代文献的回顾和内容分析来回答的一些问题。作者同时分析了世界上信教人数增加的数字(绝对)和信教人数百分比的数字(相对)是否是宗教在以前的重要性背景下回归的有效指标。根据近四十年来这一领域的发展趋势,以及当代一神论留下的历史遗产,本文还提出了一个在即将到来的冲突背景下预测宗教未来的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religion and war - the return of the written-off
Famous German sociologist and philosopher, Jurgen Habermas, often points out that we not only live in postmodern but in ?post-secular society? as well. This post-secular society appears as a significant opposite to the society which we heard about several decades ago, and which was mostly secular or striving towards secularity. Almost all of the 20th century, and especially decades after World War II, was marked with stands that religion and the Holy are losing its significance in contemporary society. However, at the end of the 20th and especially at the beginning of the turbulent 21st century, we are witnessing the fact that religion is not defeated. More precisely, it did not lose its place both in private and public life. It is obvious that religion was ?under the radar? for different anticipators from the 20th century, which proved that it is still a complex social phenomenon that cannot be easily explained nor predicted. How did religion come back from ?nonsense? to the main stage of important contemporary social phenomena? What are the potentials of religion in causing, and what in the pacification of conflicts? What are the characteristics of religion-inspired conflicts, then and now? How contemporary monotheisms see the (just) war? These are some of the questions we tried to answer in this paper through the review of contemporary literature and content analysis. The author simultaneously analysed if numbers about the increase of believers in the world (absolute) and numbers in the percentage of faithful ones (relative) are valid indicators that religion returned in the context of former importance. Based on trends existing in this field during the last forty years, as well as on historical heritage left behind by contemporary monotheisms, the paper also presents a framework for a prognosis about the future of religion in the context of the upcoming conflicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信