计算树逻辑重写规则的验证

J. McCabe-Dansted, M. Reynolds
{"title":"计算树逻辑重写规则的验证","authors":"J. McCabe-Dansted, M. Reynolds","doi":"10.1109/TIME.2014.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of procedures for checking the satisfiability of formulas in the important branching time temporal logic CTL* have recently been proposed. This paper instead focuses on automatic generation and verification of rewrite rules for computation tree logics; shows that non-local computation tree logics can be used to verify rewrite rules, including for CTL*; presents an efficient tableau for the non-local bundled variant NL-BCTL*; and shows that NL-BCTL* is 2EXPTIME-complete. We show that such rules can quickly simplify CTL* formulas. These simplified formulas are shorter and easier to reason with using existing decision procedures for CTL*, as demonstrated by significant speed-ups across a wide range of benchmark formulas. While CTL* is not widely used due to the complexity of its reasoning tasks, it is strictly more expressive than LTL or CTL. Furthermore, there are applications for theorem-proving and model-checking.","PeriodicalId":309715,"journal":{"name":"2014 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verification of Rewrite Rules for Computation Tree Logics\",\"authors\":\"J. McCabe-Dansted, M. Reynolds\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TIME.2014.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A number of procedures for checking the satisfiability of formulas in the important branching time temporal logic CTL* have recently been proposed. This paper instead focuses on automatic generation and verification of rewrite rules for computation tree logics; shows that non-local computation tree logics can be used to verify rewrite rules, including for CTL*; presents an efficient tableau for the non-local bundled variant NL-BCTL*; and shows that NL-BCTL* is 2EXPTIME-complete. We show that such rules can quickly simplify CTL* formulas. These simplified formulas are shorter and easier to reason with using existing decision procedures for CTL*, as demonstrated by significant speed-ups across a wide range of benchmark formulas. While CTL* is not widely used due to the complexity of its reasoning tasks, it is strictly more expressive than LTL or CTL. Furthermore, there are applications for theorem-proving and model-checking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2014.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 21st International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TIME.2014.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

最近提出了一些检验重要分支时间时间逻辑CTL*中公式可满足性的方法。本文转而关注计算树逻辑重写规则的自动生成和验证;表明非局部计算树逻辑可用于验证重写规则,包括CTL*;提出了非局部捆绑型NL-BCTL*的高效表;并表明NL-BCTL*是2exptime完备的。我们证明了这些规则可以快速简化CTL*公式。这些简化的公式更短,更容易使用CTL*的现有决策程序进行推理,正如在广泛的基准公式中显着加速所证明的那样。虽然CTL*由于其推理任务的复杂性而没有被广泛使用,但它严格地比LTL或CTL更具表现力。此外,还有定理证明和模型检查的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verification of Rewrite Rules for Computation Tree Logics
A number of procedures for checking the satisfiability of formulas in the important branching time temporal logic CTL* have recently been proposed. This paper instead focuses on automatic generation and verification of rewrite rules for computation tree logics; shows that non-local computation tree logics can be used to verify rewrite rules, including for CTL*; presents an efficient tableau for the non-local bundled variant NL-BCTL*; and shows that NL-BCTL* is 2EXPTIME-complete. We show that such rules can quickly simplify CTL* formulas. These simplified formulas are shorter and easier to reason with using existing decision procedures for CTL*, as demonstrated by significant speed-ups across a wide range of benchmark formulas. While CTL* is not widely used due to the complexity of its reasoning tasks, it is strictly more expressive than LTL or CTL. Furthermore, there are applications for theorem-proving and model-checking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信