DSP技术在高复杂RF-MEMS结构有效建模与设计中的比较研究

Jong-Hoon Lee, N. Bushyager, M. Tentzeris
{"title":"DSP技术在高复杂RF-MEMS结构有效建模与设计中的比较研究","authors":"Jong-Hoon Lee, N. Bushyager, M. Tentzeris","doi":"10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Four DSP-based digital predictors (Prony's, covariance, forward-backward, matrix pencil), that are commonly used to enhance the time-domain modeling and design of highly complex RF MEMS structures, are evaluated in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy as a function of the model order, the decimating factor, and the size of sample train. For a benchmarking case of an RF MEMS tuner, it is found that while covariance method has the best performance in terms of accuracy matrix pencil method confers robustness to computational economies (less numerical effort) and saves more CPU time with a smaller model order that can be selected by easy and efficient criteria.","PeriodicalId":407683,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of DSP techniques for the effective modeling and design of highly complex RF-MEMS structures\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Hoon Lee, N. Bushyager, M. Tentzeris\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Four DSP-based digital predictors (Prony's, covariance, forward-backward, matrix pencil), that are commonly used to enhance the time-domain modeling and design of highly complex RF MEMS structures, are evaluated in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy as a function of the model order, the decimating factor, and the size of sample train. For a benchmarking case of an RF MEMS tuner, it is found that while covariance method has the best performance in terms of accuracy matrix pencil method confers robustness to computational economies (less numerical effort) and saves more CPU time with a smaller model order that can be selected by easy and efficient criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":407683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Computational Electromagnetics in Time-Domain, 2005. CEM-TD 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEMTD.2005.1531719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通常用于增强高度复杂RF MEMS结构的时域建模和设计的四种基于dsp的数字预测器(proony 's,协方差,前向向后,矩阵铅笔)在计算效率和准确性方面作为模型顺序,抽取因子和样本序列大小的函数进行了评估。对于射频MEMS调谐器的基准测试案例,发现虽然协方差方法在精度方面具有最佳性能,但矩阵铅笔方法具有计算经济的鲁棒性(较少的数值工作),并且可以通过简单有效的标准选择较小的模型顺序,从而节省更多的CPU时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of DSP techniques for the effective modeling and design of highly complex RF-MEMS structures
Four DSP-based digital predictors (Prony's, covariance, forward-backward, matrix pencil), that are commonly used to enhance the time-domain modeling and design of highly complex RF MEMS structures, are evaluated in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy as a function of the model order, the decimating factor, and the size of sample train. For a benchmarking case of an RF MEMS tuner, it is found that while covariance method has the best performance in terms of accuracy matrix pencil method confers robustness to computational economies (less numerical effort) and saves more CPU time with a smaller model order that can be selected by easy and efficient criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信