{"title":"围攻:工作组织中冲突的文化方法","authors":"F. M. Montalbán, Maria Auxiliadora Durán Durán","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.735105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aims of this project are to analyze the relationships between organizational culture and mobbing in the workplace, and to identify the features of that culture, considered as specific risk factors which facilitate the mobbing processes development. As a first step, we develop an on-line inventory to assess the perception of the organizational culture. The answers of key individuals in the organization/department (union delegates, management, members of prevention services, etc.) will be used in focus groups created to analyze the mobbing processes in the organization/department. To emphasize organizational culture as a breeding ground for mobbing antecedents, our theoretical frame adapts the model developed by Salin (2003) paying special attention to the cultural dimension. Bullying at work would be often an interaction between structures and processes from three groups: 1) Enabling general culture; 2) Motivating culture factors; and 3) Precipitating processes. When the motivating and/or precipitating structures are present, the enabling conditions will affect whether mobbing is possible or not in a specific organization. In this context, appears what some authors have called (Lewis, French & Steane, 1997) a culture of conflict, an environment where the conflictive component becomes a culture's dominant feature.","PeriodicalId":324633,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Party Conflict","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobbing: A Cultural Approach of Conflict in Work Organizations\",\"authors\":\"F. M. Montalbán, Maria Auxiliadora Durán Durán\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.735105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aims of this project are to analyze the relationships between organizational culture and mobbing in the workplace, and to identify the features of that culture, considered as specific risk factors which facilitate the mobbing processes development. As a first step, we develop an on-line inventory to assess the perception of the organizational culture. The answers of key individuals in the organization/department (union delegates, management, members of prevention services, etc.) will be used in focus groups created to analyze the mobbing processes in the organization/department. To emphasize organizational culture as a breeding ground for mobbing antecedents, our theoretical frame adapts the model developed by Salin (2003) paying special attention to the cultural dimension. Bullying at work would be often an interaction between structures and processes from three groups: 1) Enabling general culture; 2) Motivating culture factors; and 3) Precipitating processes. When the motivating and/or precipitating structures are present, the enabling conditions will affect whether mobbing is possible or not in a specific organization. In this context, appears what some authors have called (Lewis, French & Steane, 1997) a culture of conflict, an environment where the conflictive component becomes a culture's dominant feature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324633,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multiple Party Conflict\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multiple Party Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.735105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Party Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.735105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
这个项目的目的是分析组织文化与工作场所的围攻之间的关系,并确定该文化的特征,被认为是促进围攻过程发展的具体风险因素。作为第一步,我们开发了一个在线清单来评估组织文化的感知。组织/部门中关键人物(工会代表、管理层、预防服务人员等)的回答将用于创建焦点小组,以分析组织/部门的围捕过程。为了强调组织文化是聚集前因的滋生地,我们的理论框架采用了Salin(2003)开发的模型,特别关注文化维度。工作中的欺凌通常是来自三个群体的结构和过程之间的相互作用:1)促进一般文化;2)激励文化因素;3)沉淀过程。当激励和/或沉淀结构存在时,使能条件将影响在特定组织中是否可能进行围殴。在这种背景下,出现了一些作者所说的(Lewis, French & Steane, 1997)冲突文化,在这种环境中,冲突成分成为文化的主要特征。
Mobbing: A Cultural Approach of Conflict in Work Organizations
The aims of this project are to analyze the relationships between organizational culture and mobbing in the workplace, and to identify the features of that culture, considered as specific risk factors which facilitate the mobbing processes development. As a first step, we develop an on-line inventory to assess the perception of the organizational culture. The answers of key individuals in the organization/department (union delegates, management, members of prevention services, etc.) will be used in focus groups created to analyze the mobbing processes in the organization/department. To emphasize organizational culture as a breeding ground for mobbing antecedents, our theoretical frame adapts the model developed by Salin (2003) paying special attention to the cultural dimension. Bullying at work would be often an interaction between structures and processes from three groups: 1) Enabling general culture; 2) Motivating culture factors; and 3) Precipitating processes. When the motivating and/or precipitating structures are present, the enabling conditions will affect whether mobbing is possible or not in a specific organization. In this context, appears what some authors have called (Lewis, French & Steane, 1997) a culture of conflict, an environment where the conflictive component becomes a culture's dominant feature.