{"title":"隐喻作为语言哲学理解的对象","authors":"V. Makashova","doi":"10.32743/uniphil.2022.97.7.14081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of metaphor has long been of interest to researchers in various fields of knowledge. In each historical epoch, a special system of ideas about metaphor was formed: ancient scholars considered metaphor as a means of decorating artistic speech, medieval scholars saw it as a way of learning divine truth. Representatives of modern philosophy believed that metaphor was a source of confusion and ambiguity, therefore, it was subject to exclusion from the language of science. In the modern","PeriodicalId":178466,"journal":{"name":"Universum:Philology and art history","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"METAPHOR AS AN OBJECT OF LINGUOPHILOSOPHICAL COMPREHENSION\",\"authors\":\"V. Makashova\",\"doi\":\"10.32743/uniphil.2022.97.7.14081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of metaphor has long been of interest to researchers in various fields of knowledge. In each historical epoch, a special system of ideas about metaphor was formed: ancient scholars considered metaphor as a means of decorating artistic speech, medieval scholars saw it as a way of learning divine truth. Representatives of modern philosophy believed that metaphor was a source of confusion and ambiguity, therefore, it was subject to exclusion from the language of science. In the modern\",\"PeriodicalId\":178466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universum:Philology and art history\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universum:Philology and art history\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32743/uniphil.2022.97.7.14081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universum:Philology and art history","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32743/uniphil.2022.97.7.14081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
METAPHOR AS AN OBJECT OF LINGUOPHILOSOPHICAL COMPREHENSION
The problem of metaphor has long been of interest to researchers in various fields of knowledge. In each historical epoch, a special system of ideas about metaphor was formed: ancient scholars considered metaphor as a means of decorating artistic speech, medieval scholars saw it as a way of learning divine truth. Representatives of modern philosophy believed that metaphor was a source of confusion and ambiguity, therefore, it was subject to exclusion from the language of science. In the modern
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
