简单还是灵活?互补滤波器与EKF在移动设备上的方向估计

Michał R. Nowicki, Jan Wietrzykowski, P. Skrzypczyński
{"title":"简单还是灵活?互补滤波器与EKF在移动设备上的方向估计","authors":"Michał R. Nowicki, Jan Wietrzykowski, P. Skrzypczyński","doi":"10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary mobile devices can be used as navigation aids. The embedded gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer used together may form a reliable AHRS (Attitude and Heading Reference System), which estimates the orientation of the device with respect to the global reference frame. However, a question arises: which framework to use in order to integrate the noisy data under the tight computing power and energy limitations of a mobile device? While the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is considered the standard framework to solve estimation problems in navigation, in practice the much simpler Complementary Filter is often applied in systems of limited resources. In this paper we compare the strengths and drawbacks of both frameworks in the application context of Android-based mobile devices. The comparison is focused on the assessment of accuracy and reliability in several real-world motion scenarios.","PeriodicalId":177233,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplicity or flexibility? Complementary Filter vs. EKF for orientation estimation on mobile devices\",\"authors\":\"Michał R. Nowicki, Jan Wietrzykowski, P. Skrzypczyński\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary mobile devices can be used as navigation aids. The embedded gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer used together may form a reliable AHRS (Attitude and Heading Reference System), which estimates the orientation of the device with respect to the global reference frame. However, a question arises: which framework to use in order to integrate the noisy data under the tight computing power and energy limitations of a mobile device? While the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is considered the standard framework to solve estimation problems in navigation, in practice the much simpler Complementary Filter is often applied in systems of limited resources. In this paper we compare the strengths and drawbacks of both frameworks in the application context of Android-based mobile devices. The comparison is focused on the assessment of accuracy and reliability in several real-world motion scenarios.\",\"PeriodicalId\":177233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cybernetics (CYBCONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CYBConf.2015.7175926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

现代移动设备可以用作导航辅助设备。嵌入式陀螺仪,加速度计和磁力计一起使用可以形成一个可靠的AHRS(姿态和航向参考系统),它可以根据全局参考框架估计设备的方向。然而,一个问题出现了:在移动设备有限的计算能力和能量限制下,使用哪种框架来集成有噪声的数据?虽然扩展卡尔曼滤波(EKF)被认为是解决导航估计问题的标准框架,但在实际应用中,更简单的互补滤波通常用于资源有限的系统。在本文中,我们比较了这两个框架在基于android的移动设备的应用环境中的优缺点。比较的重点是在几个真实世界的运动场景的准确性和可靠性的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simplicity or flexibility? Complementary Filter vs. EKF for orientation estimation on mobile devices
Contemporary mobile devices can be used as navigation aids. The embedded gyroscope, accelerometer and magnetometer used together may form a reliable AHRS (Attitude and Heading Reference System), which estimates the orientation of the device with respect to the global reference frame. However, a question arises: which framework to use in order to integrate the noisy data under the tight computing power and energy limitations of a mobile device? While the Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) is considered the standard framework to solve estimation problems in navigation, in practice the much simpler Complementary Filter is often applied in systems of limited resources. In this paper we compare the strengths and drawbacks of both frameworks in the application context of Android-based mobile devices. The comparison is focused on the assessment of accuracy and reliability in several real-world motion scenarios.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信