WTO争端的正当程序

A. Mitchell
{"title":"WTO争端的正当程序","authors":"A. Mitchell","doi":"10.1017/CBO9780511754340.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due process is a necessary component of any legal system seeking legitimacy and effectiveness. The dispute settlement system of the WTO is no exception. Indeed, the potentially vast political and economic effects of trade liberalization and protectionism, the opportunity for Members to challenge domestic regulations of sovereign governments using WTO rules, and the power differences between WTO Members all heighten the need for fair rule enforcement in the WTO. WTO due process obligations are of two types. The first are obligations imposed within the WTO dispute settlement system, such as the rules that protect fairness between the parties in panel proceedings. The second are obligations imposed on WTO Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’. While both types of due process obligations are important and could be the subject of a WTO dispute settlement proceeding, for reasons of space, this chapter is restricted to the first type. This chapter begins by examining the content of the principle of due process and its justification, placing the specific meaning of the principle in the WTO within its wider context in domestic law and international law generally. Although the obligations discussed in this section relate primarily to the provision of due process in domestic legal systems, they also assist in understanding the nature of due process in the WTO dispute settlement system. Next I examine the WTO provisions that can be seen as imposing due process obligations in relation to the dispute settlement system, taking into account the interpretation of these provisions to date by WTO panels and the Appellate Body (described for convenience as WTO adjudicating bodies in this chapter). Finally, I consider the inherent powers of WTO adjudicating bodies to protect due process in disputes, independent of any specific WTO provisions. This chapter does not address the WTO obligations imposed on Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as through Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’.","PeriodicalId":122765,"journal":{"name":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Due Process in WTO Disputes\",\"authors\":\"A. Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/CBO9780511754340.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due process is a necessary component of any legal system seeking legitimacy and effectiveness. The dispute settlement system of the WTO is no exception. Indeed, the potentially vast political and economic effects of trade liberalization and protectionism, the opportunity for Members to challenge domestic regulations of sovereign governments using WTO rules, and the power differences between WTO Members all heighten the need for fair rule enforcement in the WTO. WTO due process obligations are of two types. The first are obligations imposed within the WTO dispute settlement system, such as the rules that protect fairness between the parties in panel proceedings. The second are obligations imposed on WTO Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’. While both types of due process obligations are important and could be the subject of a WTO dispute settlement proceeding, for reasons of space, this chapter is restricted to the first type. This chapter begins by examining the content of the principle of due process and its justification, placing the specific meaning of the principle in the WTO within its wider context in domestic law and international law generally. Although the obligations discussed in this section relate primarily to the provision of due process in domestic legal systems, they also assist in understanding the nature of due process in the WTO dispute settlement system. Next I examine the WTO provisions that can be seen as imposing due process obligations in relation to the dispute settlement system, taking into account the interpretation of these provisions to date by WTO panels and the Appellate Body (described for convenience as WTO adjudicating bodies in this chapter). Finally, I consider the inherent powers of WTO adjudicating bodies to protect due process in disputes, independent of any specific WTO provisions. This chapter does not address the WTO obligations imposed on Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as through Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":122765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754340.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: WTO Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754340.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

正当程序是任何寻求合法性和有效性的法律制度的必要组成部分。世贸组织的争端解决机制也不例外。事实上,贸易自由化和保护主义潜在的巨大政治和经济影响,成员利用世贸组织规则挑战主权政府国内法规的机会,以及世贸组织成员之间的权力差异,都加剧了世贸组织公平执行规则的必要性。WTO正当程序义务有两种类型。首先是世贸组织争端解决机制规定的义务,例如在专家组程序中保护各方之间公平的规则。二是世贸组织成员有义务确保其国内法律体系的正当程序,如1994年关贸总协定第X条第3款(a)项,该条款要求第X条第1款所述的所有“法律、法规、决定和裁决”应“以统一、公正和合理的方式”执行。虽然两种类型的正当程序义务都很重要,并且可能成为世贸组织争端解决程序的主题,但由于篇幅所限,本章仅限于第一种类型。本章首先考察正当程序原则的内容及其正当性,将该原则在WTO中的具体含义置于国内法和一般国际法的更广泛背景下。虽然本节讨论的义务主要涉及国内法律制度中提供正当程序,但它们也有助于理解世贸组织争端解决机制中正当程序的性质。接下来,我将研究可被视为与争端解决机制有关的施加正当程序义务的WTO条款,并考虑到WTO专家组和上诉机构(为方便起见,本章将其描述为WTO裁决机构)迄今为止对这些条款的解释。最后,我考虑世贸组织裁决机构的固有权力,以保护争端中的正当程序,独立于任何具体的世贸组织规定。本章不涉及WTO要求成员在其国内法律体系中确保正当程序的义务,例如通过GATT 1994第X条第3款(a)项,该条款要求第X条第1款所述的所有“法律、法规、决定和裁决”应“以统一、公正和合理的方式”执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Due Process in WTO Disputes
Due process is a necessary component of any legal system seeking legitimacy and effectiveness. The dispute settlement system of the WTO is no exception. Indeed, the potentially vast political and economic effects of trade liberalization and protectionism, the opportunity for Members to challenge domestic regulations of sovereign governments using WTO rules, and the power differences between WTO Members all heighten the need for fair rule enforcement in the WTO. WTO due process obligations are of two types. The first are obligations imposed within the WTO dispute settlement system, such as the rules that protect fairness between the parties in panel proceedings. The second are obligations imposed on WTO Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’. While both types of due process obligations are important and could be the subject of a WTO dispute settlement proceeding, for reasons of space, this chapter is restricted to the first type. This chapter begins by examining the content of the principle of due process and its justification, placing the specific meaning of the principle in the WTO within its wider context in domestic law and international law generally. Although the obligations discussed in this section relate primarily to the provision of due process in domestic legal systems, they also assist in understanding the nature of due process in the WTO dispute settlement system. Next I examine the WTO provisions that can be seen as imposing due process obligations in relation to the dispute settlement system, taking into account the interpretation of these provisions to date by WTO panels and the Appellate Body (described for convenience as WTO adjudicating bodies in this chapter). Finally, I consider the inherent powers of WTO adjudicating bodies to protect due process in disputes, independent of any specific WTO provisions. This chapter does not address the WTO obligations imposed on Members to ensure due process in their domestic legal systems, such as through Article X:3(a) of the GATT 1994, which requires that all ‘laws, regulations, decisions and rulings’ of the kind described in Article X:1 be administered ‘in a uniform, impartial and reasonable manner’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信