你的烟雾探测器工作正常吗?:烟雾探测器的鲁棒容错方法

Arjun Tambe, A. Nambi, Sumukh Marathe
{"title":"你的烟雾探测器工作正常吗?:烟雾探测器的鲁棒容错方法","authors":"Arjun Tambe, A. Nambi, Sumukh Marathe","doi":"10.1145/3458864.3466869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Billions of smoke detectors are in use worldwide to provide early warning of fires. Despite this, they frequently fail to operate in an ongoing fire, risking death and property damage. A significant fraction of faults result from drift, or reduced sensitivity, and other faults in smoke detectors' phototransistors (PTs). Existing approaches attempt to detect drift from the PT output in normal conditions (without smoke). However, we find that drifted PTs mimic the output of working PTs in normal conditions, but diverge in the presence of smoke, making this approach ineffective. This paper presents two novel approaches to systematically detect faults and measure and compensate for drift in smoke detectors' PTs. Our first approach, called FallTime, measures a PT \"fingerprint,\" a unique electrical characteristic with distinct behavior for working, drifted, and faulty components. FallTime can be added to many existing smoke detector models in software alone, with no/minimal hardware modifications. Our second approach, DriftTestButton, is a mechanical test button that simulates the behavior of smoke when pressed. It offers a robust, straightforward approach to detect faults, and can measure and compensate for drift across the entire smoke detector system. We empirically evaluate both approaches and present extensive experimental results from actual smoke detectors deployed in a commercial building, along with custom-built smoke detectors. By conducting tests with live smoke, we show that both FallTime and DriftTestButton perform more effectively than existing fault tolerance techniques and stand to substantially reduce the risk that a smoke detector fails to alarm in the presence of smoke.","PeriodicalId":153361,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is your smoke detector working properly?: robust fault tolerance approaches for smoke detectors\",\"authors\":\"Arjun Tambe, A. Nambi, Sumukh Marathe\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3458864.3466869\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Billions of smoke detectors are in use worldwide to provide early warning of fires. Despite this, they frequently fail to operate in an ongoing fire, risking death and property damage. A significant fraction of faults result from drift, or reduced sensitivity, and other faults in smoke detectors' phototransistors (PTs). Existing approaches attempt to detect drift from the PT output in normal conditions (without smoke). However, we find that drifted PTs mimic the output of working PTs in normal conditions, but diverge in the presence of smoke, making this approach ineffective. This paper presents two novel approaches to systematically detect faults and measure and compensate for drift in smoke detectors' PTs. Our first approach, called FallTime, measures a PT \\\"fingerprint,\\\" a unique electrical characteristic with distinct behavior for working, drifted, and faulty components. FallTime can be added to many existing smoke detector models in software alone, with no/minimal hardware modifications. Our second approach, DriftTestButton, is a mechanical test button that simulates the behavior of smoke when pressed. It offers a robust, straightforward approach to detect faults, and can measure and compensate for drift across the entire smoke detector system. We empirically evaluate both approaches and present extensive experimental results from actual smoke detectors deployed in a commercial building, along with custom-built smoke detectors. By conducting tests with live smoke, we show that both FallTime and DriftTestButton perform more effectively than existing fault tolerance techniques and stand to substantially reduce the risk that a smoke detector fails to alarm in the presence of smoke.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3458864.3466869\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3458864.3466869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

全世界有数十亿个烟雾探测器用于提供火灾的早期预警。尽管如此,他们经常不能在持续的火灾中行动,冒着死亡和财产损失的风险。很大一部分故障是由于烟雾探测器光电晶体管(PTs)的漂移或灵敏度降低以及其他故障造成的。现有的方法试图在正常情况下(没有烟雾)检测PT输出的漂移。然而,我们发现漂移的PTs模拟正常条件下工作PTs的输出,但在烟雾存在时发散,使这种方法无效。本文提出了两种新的方法来系统地检测烟雾探测器的故障和测量和补偿漂移。我们的第一种方法称为FallTime,测量PT“指纹”,这是一种独特的电气特性,对于工作、漂移和故障组件具有不同的行为。FallTime可以单独在软件中添加到许多现有的烟雾探测器模型中,而无需/最小的硬件修改。我们的第二种方法是DriftTestButton,它是一个机械测试按钮,可以模拟按下时烟雾的行为。它提供了一种鲁棒,直接的方法来检测故障,并可以测量和补偿整个烟雾探测器系统的漂移。我们对这两种方法进行了实证评估,并从实际部署在商业建筑中的烟雾探测器以及定制的烟雾探测器中提供了广泛的实验结果。通过对实时烟雾进行测试,我们发现FallTime和DriftTestButton都比现有的容错技术更有效,并且大大降低了烟雾探测器在烟雾存在时无法报警的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is your smoke detector working properly?: robust fault tolerance approaches for smoke detectors
Billions of smoke detectors are in use worldwide to provide early warning of fires. Despite this, they frequently fail to operate in an ongoing fire, risking death and property damage. A significant fraction of faults result from drift, or reduced sensitivity, and other faults in smoke detectors' phototransistors (PTs). Existing approaches attempt to detect drift from the PT output in normal conditions (without smoke). However, we find that drifted PTs mimic the output of working PTs in normal conditions, but diverge in the presence of smoke, making this approach ineffective. This paper presents two novel approaches to systematically detect faults and measure and compensate for drift in smoke detectors' PTs. Our first approach, called FallTime, measures a PT "fingerprint," a unique electrical characteristic with distinct behavior for working, drifted, and faulty components. FallTime can be added to many existing smoke detector models in software alone, with no/minimal hardware modifications. Our second approach, DriftTestButton, is a mechanical test button that simulates the behavior of smoke when pressed. It offers a robust, straightforward approach to detect faults, and can measure and compensate for drift across the entire smoke detector system. We empirically evaluate both approaches and present extensive experimental results from actual smoke detectors deployed in a commercial building, along with custom-built smoke detectors. By conducting tests with live smoke, we show that both FallTime and DriftTestButton perform more effectively than existing fault tolerance techniques and stand to substantially reduce the risk that a smoke detector fails to alarm in the presence of smoke.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信