原作之后:霍勒和莱昂纳多的《救世主》

Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon
{"title":"原作之后:霍勒和莱昂纳多的《救世主》","authors":"Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 12 reviews the Bohemian artist Wencelaus Hollar’s 1650 etching of Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi, which, he stated, was made from the original painting. Can we identify Hollar’s model, and on what basis did he attribute it to Leonardo? From a comparison with the closest extant compositions—the Cook, Naples, and Ganay paintings—the chapter examines the consonances and dissonances between the respective paintings and the etching. Since the Ganay painting has been championed (without acceptance) as Leonardo’s original, a history of the scholarly appraisal of this painting, together with some clarifications of its pre-twentieth-century provenance, is presented here. Hollar’s etching is dated 1650, but the location of execution is not given. Can we pinpoint the location in 1650 of any of the prime contenders, and if so, can Hollar be placed in proximity? The chapter proposes that Hollar, perhaps acting for the agent of Cardinal Mazarin, copied Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi at the Commonwealth Sale in 1650.","PeriodicalId":347013,"journal":{"name":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"After the Original: Hollar and Leonardo’s Salvator\",\"authors\":\"Margaret Dalivalle, M. Kemp, R. B. Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 12 reviews the Bohemian artist Wencelaus Hollar’s 1650 etching of Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi, which, he stated, was made from the original painting. Can we identify Hollar’s model, and on what basis did he attribute it to Leonardo? From a comparison with the closest extant compositions—the Cook, Naples, and Ganay paintings—the chapter examines the consonances and dissonances between the respective paintings and the etching. Since the Ganay painting has been championed (without acceptance) as Leonardo’s original, a history of the scholarly appraisal of this painting, together with some clarifications of its pre-twentieth-century provenance, is presented here. Hollar’s etching is dated 1650, but the location of execution is not given. Can we pinpoint the location in 1650 of any of the prime contenders, and if so, can Hollar be placed in proximity? The chapter proposes that Hollar, perhaps acting for the agent of Cardinal Mazarin, copied Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi at the Commonwealth Sale in 1650.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leonardo's Salvator Mundi and the Collecting of Leonardo in the Stuart Courts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198813835.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第12章回顾了波希米亚艺术家Wencelaus Hollar在1650年为达芬奇的《救世主》(Salvator Mundi)蚀刻的作品,他说这幅画是根据原作制作的。我们能辨认出Hollar的模型吗?他是根据什么把它归为Leonardo的?通过与最接近的现存作品——库克、那不勒斯和加内的画作——的比较,本章检查了各自画作与蚀刻之间的和谐和不和谐。由于Ganay的这幅画一直被认为是达芬奇的原作(但没有被接受),本文将介绍这幅画的学术评估历史,以及对它在20世纪之前的出处的一些澄清。Hollar的蚀刻画的年代是1650年,但没有给出创作地点。我们能确定1650年任何一个主要竞争者的位置吗,如果能,Hollar能在附近吗?这一章提出,霍勒可能是红衣主教马扎林的代理人,在1650年的联邦拍卖会上复制了列奥纳多的《救世主》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
After the Original: Hollar and Leonardo’s Salvator
Chapter 12 reviews the Bohemian artist Wencelaus Hollar’s 1650 etching of Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi, which, he stated, was made from the original painting. Can we identify Hollar’s model, and on what basis did he attribute it to Leonardo? From a comparison with the closest extant compositions—the Cook, Naples, and Ganay paintings—the chapter examines the consonances and dissonances between the respective paintings and the etching. Since the Ganay painting has been championed (without acceptance) as Leonardo’s original, a history of the scholarly appraisal of this painting, together with some clarifications of its pre-twentieth-century provenance, is presented here. Hollar’s etching is dated 1650, but the location of execution is not given. Can we pinpoint the location in 1650 of any of the prime contenders, and if so, can Hollar be placed in proximity? The chapter proposes that Hollar, perhaps acting for the agent of Cardinal Mazarin, copied Leonardo’s Salvator Mundi at the Commonwealth Sale in 1650.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信