{"title":"《多马福音》和《柏拉图论稳定","authors":"I. Miroshnikov","doi":"10.1163/9789004367296_006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inwhat follows, I argue that “standing” in these, aswell as in a fewotherThomasine sayings, denotes the Platonist idea of divine stability; it is, therefore, no coincidence that these two metaphysical concepts, stability and oneness, are brought together. I first discuss interpretations of Thomasine “standing” by April D. DeConick, Michael AllenWilliams, and Robert Murray, and argue that the context of the Thomasine sayings that deal with “standing” does not support the proposals of these scholars. I then discuss the multifold meanings of the expression ⲱϩⲉ ⲉⲣⲁⲧ⸗ in these sayings as well as in their Greek Vorlagen. Finally, I discuss the Platonist parallels to the sayings that seem to refer to “transcendental ‘standing.’ ”1","PeriodicalId":447913,"journal":{"name":"The Gospel of Thomas and Plato","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Stability\",\"authors\":\"I. Miroshnikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004367296_006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Inwhat follows, I argue that “standing” in these, aswell as in a fewotherThomasine sayings, denotes the Platonist idea of divine stability; it is, therefore, no coincidence that these two metaphysical concepts, stability and oneness, are brought together. I first discuss interpretations of Thomasine “standing” by April D. DeConick, Michael AllenWilliams, and Robert Murray, and argue that the context of the Thomasine sayings that deal with “standing” does not support the proposals of these scholars. I then discuss the multifold meanings of the expression ⲱϩⲉ ⲉⲣⲁⲧ⸗ in these sayings as well as in their Greek Vorlagen. Finally, I discuss the Platonist parallels to the sayings that seem to refer to “transcendental ‘standing.’ ”1\",\"PeriodicalId\":447913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Gospel of Thomas and Plato\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Gospel of Thomas and Plato\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004367296_006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Gospel of Thomas and Plato","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004367296_006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在接下来的文章中,我认为“站”在这些以及其他一些托马斯的说法中,表示柏拉图的神圣稳定观念;因此,稳定性和统一性这两个形而上学的概念结合在一起,并不是偶然的。我首先讨论了April D. DeConick、Michael AllenWilliams和Robert Murray对托马斯“站立”的解释,并认为托马斯关于“站立”的说法的上下文并不支持这些学者的建议。然后,我讨论了在这些说法以及他们的希腊Vorlagen中表达的多重含义:最后,我将讨论柏拉图主义与似乎指“先验”地位的说法的相似之处。’”1
The Gospel of Thomas and the Platonists on Stability
Inwhat follows, I argue that “standing” in these, aswell as in a fewotherThomasine sayings, denotes the Platonist idea of divine stability; it is, therefore, no coincidence that these two metaphysical concepts, stability and oneness, are brought together. I first discuss interpretations of Thomasine “standing” by April D. DeConick, Michael AllenWilliams, and Robert Murray, and argue that the context of the Thomasine sayings that deal with “standing” does not support the proposals of these scholars. I then discuss the multifold meanings of the expression ⲱϩⲉ ⲉⲣⲁⲧ⸗ in these sayings as well as in their Greek Vorlagen. Finally, I discuss the Platonist parallels to the sayings that seem to refer to “transcendental ‘standing.’ ”1