定量案例研究评估英国超市建筑与未来气候变化和现代建筑技术(MMCs)的关系

A. Hasan, Ali Bahadori-Jahromi, A. Mylona, Mark Barthorpe
{"title":"定量案例研究评估英国超市建筑与未来气候变化和现代建筑技术(MMCs)的关系","authors":"A. Hasan, Ali Bahadori-Jahromi, A. Mylona, Mark Barthorpe","doi":"10.36828/efs.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates variousmethods of construction of non-domestic buildings and its effect on buildingperformance of a typical UK supermarket under the worst-case scenarios of 2080speriod of climate change. Focus is specifically on the three LIDL-approvedconstruction methods and their building materials to quantify operationalenergy usage and carbon emissions. The ThermalAnalysis Software (TAS), a dynamic building simulation package, is used toquantify the results, generating reports while Chartered Institution of BuildingServices Engineers (CIBSE) provides with the current and future weather filesto be tested. The case study is based on a newly built single-story supermarketbuilding located in Norwich and uses three models of building P1, P2 and P3with specific set of building materials. The results show that models P1 and P2have percentage increase of close to 8.80% of energy consumption and carbonemission however, P3 have less than 8.50% increase as compared to the currentconditions of the building making it a slightly better choice. It shows that aprecast concrete and glulam beam structure offer the best resistance againstthe worst climate change scenario. This investigation joins the two differentsides of built environment, construction and operation while presenting theresults.","PeriodicalId":294732,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Future Sustainability","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quantitative case study to assess the performance of UK supermarket buildings in relation to future climate change and modern construction techniques (MMCs)\",\"authors\":\"A. Hasan, Ali Bahadori-Jahromi, A. Mylona, Mark Barthorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.36828/efs.205\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates variousmethods of construction of non-domestic buildings and its effect on buildingperformance of a typical UK supermarket under the worst-case scenarios of 2080speriod of climate change. Focus is specifically on the three LIDL-approvedconstruction methods and their building materials to quantify operationalenergy usage and carbon emissions. The ThermalAnalysis Software (TAS), a dynamic building simulation package, is used toquantify the results, generating reports while Chartered Institution of BuildingServices Engineers (CIBSE) provides with the current and future weather filesto be tested. The case study is based on a newly built single-story supermarketbuilding located in Norwich and uses three models of building P1, P2 and P3with specific set of building materials. The results show that models P1 and P2have percentage increase of close to 8.80% of energy consumption and carbonemission however, P3 have less than 8.50% increase as compared to the currentconditions of the building making it a slightly better choice. It shows that aprecast concrete and glulam beam structure offer the best resistance againstthe worst climate change scenario. This investigation joins the two differentsides of built environment, construction and operation while presenting theresults.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Future Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Future Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36828/efs.205\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Future Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36828/efs.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了在2080年气候变化时期的最坏情况下,英国一家典型超市非住宅建筑的各种建造方法及其对建筑性能的影响。重点是三种lidl批准的施工方法及其建筑材料,以量化操作能源使用和碳排放。热分析软件(TAS)是一个动态建筑模拟包,用于量化结果,生成报告,而英国特许建筑服务工程师协会(CIBSE)提供当前和未来的天气文件进行测试。本案例研究基于位于Norwich的新建单层超市建筑,并使用了三种建筑模型P1, P2和p3,并使用了特定的建筑材料。结果表明,P1和p2模式的能耗和碳排放增加百分比接近8.80%,而P3模式的能耗和碳排放增加百分比低于8.50%,与建筑现状相比,P3模式的增加百分比略好。结果表明,在最恶劣的气候变化情况下,预制混凝土和胶合木梁结构具有最佳的抗逆性。本次调查将建筑环境、施工和运营两个不同的方面结合起来,呈现出研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A quantitative case study to assess the performance of UK supermarket buildings in relation to future climate change and modern construction techniques (MMCs)
This study investigates variousmethods of construction of non-domestic buildings and its effect on buildingperformance of a typical UK supermarket under the worst-case scenarios of 2080speriod of climate change. Focus is specifically on the three LIDL-approvedconstruction methods and their building materials to quantify operationalenergy usage and carbon emissions. The ThermalAnalysis Software (TAS), a dynamic building simulation package, is used toquantify the results, generating reports while Chartered Institution of BuildingServices Engineers (CIBSE) provides with the current and future weather filesto be tested. The case study is based on a newly built single-story supermarketbuilding located in Norwich and uses three models of building P1, P2 and P3with specific set of building materials. The results show that models P1 and P2have percentage increase of close to 8.80% of energy consumption and carbonemission however, P3 have less than 8.50% increase as compared to the currentconditions of the building making it a slightly better choice. It shows that aprecast concrete and glulam beam structure offer the best resistance againstthe worst climate change scenario. This investigation joins the two differentsides of built environment, construction and operation while presenting theresults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信