简·阿莫斯·夸美纽斯《路之路》中的新教和新科学

Vítor Albiero
{"title":"简·阿莫斯·夸美纽斯《路之路》中的新教和新科学","authors":"Vítor Albiero","doi":"10.23925/1980-7651.2017v19;p56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike the researches on the pedagogical principles of Jan Amos Comenius (1592-1670), few studies have been produced about the author's involvement with the purpose and usefulness of the new science. However, based on Via lucis, which Comenius wrote when he was in England invited by Samuel Hartlib (1600-1662), between 1641 and 1642, and which he dedicated to the Royal Society of London in 1668, the present study sought to assess the interrelationship between some assumptions of Protestantism and 17th century natural philosophy. The first chapter approaches the life and training of the author, as well as the cultural and religious sources to which he had resource in the construction of the theoretical basis of his conception of knowledge and his idea of universal knowledge (pansophical thought). These aspects were related to the social, cultural and religious conditions that contributed to the formation and performance of the so-called Hartlib group, which corresponded to the concerns of the English General Reformation. The second chapter discusses the relationship between theology and the new science in Via lucis, where Comenius’ theological assumptions, which legitimized the Protestant participation in the development of the new philosophy are described. It highlights the concept of revelation (as knowledge) and its relationship to the construction of the new natural philosophy, in addition to approaching the biblical-theological principle of the Fall and the mitigating action of the new science on the deleterious effects of sin. The identification of the Comenian millennial eschatology related to efforts for the spread of knowledge and the advance of the new science is also discussed. The last chapter describes the relationship of the pan-harmony in Via lucis with the new science. Through the pan-harmonic system elaborated by Comenius, one might understand how the apprehension, organization and diffusion of universal knowledge was related to the establishment and advance of the new science. Pan-harmony is presented as a way to reach the Universal Reformation, and based on the pan-harmonic concept, examples of attempts by the author to cooperate with the method, organization, and production of the new science are provided. Finally, it is exposed the Comenian expectation that the Via lucis would aid the work of the Royal Society, as well as contribute with the efforts for the sake of Universal Reformation. Seemingly, this seldom approached work by Comenius does not only concentrate his dream of Universal Reformation, but also the expectations aroused during his stay in London with the promoters of the new science. Such expectations also seem to reveal that both Protestantism and the new science yearned for universal knowledge, based on the investigation of nature, educational development, social apparatus and the advancement of a useful science. Thus the present study hopes to contribute to the studies in history of science by proposing a salutary historiographical discussion based on the combination of the correlations between Protestantism and natural philosophy, patently present in the process and conceptualization of knowledge in 17th-century English science.","PeriodicalId":366399,"journal":{"name":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protestantism and the new science in Jan Amos Comenius’ Via lucis\",\"authors\":\"Vítor Albiero\",\"doi\":\"10.23925/1980-7651.2017v19;p56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unlike the researches on the pedagogical principles of Jan Amos Comenius (1592-1670), few studies have been produced about the author's involvement with the purpose and usefulness of the new science. However, based on Via lucis, which Comenius wrote when he was in England invited by Samuel Hartlib (1600-1662), between 1641 and 1642, and which he dedicated to the Royal Society of London in 1668, the present study sought to assess the interrelationship between some assumptions of Protestantism and 17th century natural philosophy. The first chapter approaches the life and training of the author, as well as the cultural and religious sources to which he had resource in the construction of the theoretical basis of his conception of knowledge and his idea of universal knowledge (pansophical thought). These aspects were related to the social, cultural and religious conditions that contributed to the formation and performance of the so-called Hartlib group, which corresponded to the concerns of the English General Reformation. The second chapter discusses the relationship between theology and the new science in Via lucis, where Comenius’ theological assumptions, which legitimized the Protestant participation in the development of the new philosophy are described. It highlights the concept of revelation (as knowledge) and its relationship to the construction of the new natural philosophy, in addition to approaching the biblical-theological principle of the Fall and the mitigating action of the new science on the deleterious effects of sin. The identification of the Comenian millennial eschatology related to efforts for the spread of knowledge and the advance of the new science is also discussed. The last chapter describes the relationship of the pan-harmony in Via lucis with the new science. Through the pan-harmonic system elaborated by Comenius, one might understand how the apprehension, organization and diffusion of universal knowledge was related to the establishment and advance of the new science. Pan-harmony is presented as a way to reach the Universal Reformation, and based on the pan-harmonic concept, examples of attempts by the author to cooperate with the method, organization, and production of the new science are provided. Finally, it is exposed the Comenian expectation that the Via lucis would aid the work of the Royal Society, as well as contribute with the efforts for the sake of Universal Reformation. Seemingly, this seldom approached work by Comenius does not only concentrate his dream of Universal Reformation, but also the expectations aroused during his stay in London with the promoters of the new science. Such expectations also seem to reveal that both Protestantism and the new science yearned for universal knowledge, based on the investigation of nature, educational development, social apparatus and the advancement of a useful science. Thus the present study hopes to contribute to the studies in history of science by proposing a salutary historiographical discussion based on the combination of the correlations between Protestantism and natural philosophy, patently present in the process and conceptualization of knowledge in 17th-century English science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23925/1980-7651.2017v19;p56\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circumscribere: International Journal for the History of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23925/1980-7651.2017v19;p56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与对Jan Amos Comenius(1592-1670)的教学原则的研究不同,关于作者参与这门新科学的目的和有用性的研究很少。然而,根据Comenius在1641年至1642年间受Samuel Hartlib(1600-1662)邀请在英国撰写的《Via lucis》,并于1668年献给伦敦皇家学会,本研究试图评估新教的一些假设与17世纪自然哲学之间的相互关系。第一章探讨了作者的生平和所受的训练,以及他在建构其知识概念和普遍知识思想(泛哲学思想)的理论基础时所能获得的文化和宗教资源。这些方面与社会,文化和宗教条件有关,这些条件促成了所谓的哈特利布集团的形成和表现,这与英国普遍宗教改革的关注相对应。第二章讨论了神学与新科学之间的关系,其中描述了夸美纽斯的神学假设,这些假设使新教徒参与新哲学的发展合法化。它强调了启示的概念(作为知识)及其与新自然哲学的构建的关系,除了接近堕落的圣经神学原则和新科学对罪恶有害影响的减轻作用之外。还讨论了与知识传播和新科学进步有关的夸米尼亚千禧年末世论的确定。最后一章论述了《路经》中的泛和谐与新科学的关系。通过夸美纽斯阐述的泛谐系统,我们可以理解宇宙知识的理解、组织和传播与新科学的建立和发展之间的关系。泛和谐是达到“普世改革”的一种途径,并以泛和谐的概念为基础,列举了笔者尝试与新科学的方法、组织和生产相配合的实例。最后,它暴露了科美尼人的期望,即路之路将有助于皇家学会的工作,以及为普世改革的努力做出贡献。从表面上看,这部罕有的作品不仅集中了他对宇宙宗教改革的梦想,也集中了他在伦敦与这门新科学的推动者们在一起时所激起的期望。这种期望似乎也表明,新教和新科学都渴望以对自然的研究、教育的发展、社会结构和有用科学的进步为基础的普遍知识。因此,本研究希望通过结合新教和自然哲学之间的相关性,提出一种有益的史学讨论,从而为科学史的研究做出贡献,这种相关性显然存在于17世纪英国科学的知识过程和概念化中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protestantism and the new science in Jan Amos Comenius’ Via lucis
Unlike the researches on the pedagogical principles of Jan Amos Comenius (1592-1670), few studies have been produced about the author's involvement with the purpose and usefulness of the new science. However, based on Via lucis, which Comenius wrote when he was in England invited by Samuel Hartlib (1600-1662), between 1641 and 1642, and which he dedicated to the Royal Society of London in 1668, the present study sought to assess the interrelationship between some assumptions of Protestantism and 17th century natural philosophy. The first chapter approaches the life and training of the author, as well as the cultural and religious sources to which he had resource in the construction of the theoretical basis of his conception of knowledge and his idea of universal knowledge (pansophical thought). These aspects were related to the social, cultural and religious conditions that contributed to the formation and performance of the so-called Hartlib group, which corresponded to the concerns of the English General Reformation. The second chapter discusses the relationship between theology and the new science in Via lucis, where Comenius’ theological assumptions, which legitimized the Protestant participation in the development of the new philosophy are described. It highlights the concept of revelation (as knowledge) and its relationship to the construction of the new natural philosophy, in addition to approaching the biblical-theological principle of the Fall and the mitigating action of the new science on the deleterious effects of sin. The identification of the Comenian millennial eschatology related to efforts for the spread of knowledge and the advance of the new science is also discussed. The last chapter describes the relationship of the pan-harmony in Via lucis with the new science. Through the pan-harmonic system elaborated by Comenius, one might understand how the apprehension, organization and diffusion of universal knowledge was related to the establishment and advance of the new science. Pan-harmony is presented as a way to reach the Universal Reformation, and based on the pan-harmonic concept, examples of attempts by the author to cooperate with the method, organization, and production of the new science are provided. Finally, it is exposed the Comenian expectation that the Via lucis would aid the work of the Royal Society, as well as contribute with the efforts for the sake of Universal Reformation. Seemingly, this seldom approached work by Comenius does not only concentrate his dream of Universal Reformation, but also the expectations aroused during his stay in London with the promoters of the new science. Such expectations also seem to reveal that both Protestantism and the new science yearned for universal knowledge, based on the investigation of nature, educational development, social apparatus and the advancement of a useful science. Thus the present study hopes to contribute to the studies in history of science by proposing a salutary historiographical discussion based on the combination of the correlations between Protestantism and natural philosophy, patently present in the process and conceptualization of knowledge in 17th-century English science.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信