随机调查问题顺序vs.按构念分组问题:对表观信度和相关构念联系影响的实证检验

D. Goodhue, Eleanor T. Loiacono-Mello
{"title":"随机调查问题顺序vs.按构念分组问题:对表观信度和相关构念联系影响的实证检验","authors":"D. Goodhue, Eleanor T. Loiacono-Mello","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2002.994385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been a quiet debate about the proper way to design a questionnaire when multiple questions measure each construct. Two general arguments favor intermixing the questions randomly with those of other constructs; one argument favors grouping together questions that measure a single construct. This study tests these arguments using two different versions of a Web quality instrument. One version has questions grouped and labeled, and the other has questions randomly intermixed. Six hundred and three undergraduate students filled out questionnaires, half in each condition. Several different analyses suggest that the grouped question treatment has higher calculated Cronbach's alpha reliabilities than intermixed questions, but is actually less reliable.","PeriodicalId":366006,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomizing survey question order vs. grouping questions by construct: an empirical test of the impact on apparent reliabilities and links to related constructs\",\"authors\":\"D. Goodhue, Eleanor T. Loiacono-Mello\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2002.994385\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been a quiet debate about the proper way to design a questionnaire when multiple questions measure each construct. Two general arguments favor intermixing the questions randomly with those of other constructs; one argument favors grouping together questions that measure a single construct. This study tests these arguments using two different versions of a Web quality instrument. One version has questions grouped and labeled, and the other has questions randomly intermixed. Six hundred and three undergraduate students filled out questionnaires, half in each condition. Several different analyses suggest that the grouped question treatment has higher calculated Cronbach's alpha reliabilities than intermixed questions, but is actually less reliable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":366006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994385\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2002.994385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

当多个问题测量每个结构时,设计问卷的正确方法一直存在争议。有两种观点倾向于将这些问题随机地与其他构念的问题混在一起;一种观点倾向于将测量单一结构的问题组合在一起。本研究使用两个不同版本的Web质量工具来验证这些论点。一个版本将问题分组并标记,另一个版本将问题随机混合。630名本科生填写了调查问卷,每种情况各占一半。几个不同的分析表明,分组问题处理比混合问题具有更高的计算Cronbach's alpha信度,但实际上可靠性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomizing survey question order vs. grouping questions by construct: an empirical test of the impact on apparent reliabilities and links to related constructs
There has been a quiet debate about the proper way to design a questionnaire when multiple questions measure each construct. Two general arguments favor intermixing the questions randomly with those of other constructs; one argument favors grouping together questions that measure a single construct. This study tests these arguments using two different versions of a Web quality instrument. One version has questions grouped and labeled, and the other has questions randomly intermixed. Six hundred and three undergraduate students filled out questionnaires, half in each condition. Several different analyses suggest that the grouped question treatment has higher calculated Cronbach's alpha reliabilities than intermixed questions, but is actually less reliable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信